Deriving Newtonian law of gravitation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Newtonian law of gravitation, specifically the relationship \( F \propto \frac{1}{r^2} \) for circular orbits. Participants critique the validity of the equation \( \frac{\omega}{v} = \frac{s}{r} \) due to dimensional inconsistencies and emphasize the need for reliable sources. Key derivations include using Kepler's laws and centripetal force equations, leading to the conclusion that gravitational force is expressed as \( g = \frac{K}{r^2} \). The conversation highlights the importance of consulting established physics textbooks for accurate derivations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular velocity and its relationship to linear velocity
  • Familiarity with Kepler's laws of planetary motion
  • Knowledge of centripetal force and gravitational force equations
  • Basic principles of angular momentum
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of centripetal force from first principles
  • Explore Kepler's laws and their implications for gravitational force
  • Review angular momentum concepts in classical mechanics
  • Consult reputable physics textbooks for comprehensive explanations of gravitational laws
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching classical mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the derivation of gravitational laws and their mathematical foundations.

TimeRip496
Messages
249
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


upload_2016-5-29_21-48-53.png


Homework Equations


$$\frac{\omega}{v}=\frac{s}{r}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


How to get the equation above? Cause
$$\frac{s}{r}=\omega$$ & $$\frac{\omega}{v}=\frac{1}{r}$$ since v=rw.

Source: http://www.relativitycalculator.com/Newton_Universal_Gravity_Law.shtml
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TimeRip496 said:

Homework Statement


2. Homework Equations [/B]
$$\frac{\omega}{v}=\frac{s}{r}$$
This is not a correct equation. You can see that from the dimensions. LS = 1/distance and RS = distance / distance. Your source is not very well written and takes incomprehensible mathematical steps that appear to me to be wrong.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
This is not a correct equation. You can see that from the dimensions. LS = 1/distance and RS = distance / distance. Your source is not very well written and takes incomprehensible mathematical steps that appear to me to be wrong.

AM
Thanks! That's what I thought so. But without that step, I cannot continue and the subsequent steps that the source provides are useless in helping me to derive the Newtonian law of gravitation. Is there a correct way to derive the Newtonian laws of gravitation?
 
The author is trying to show how Kepler's laws lead to the ##F \propto 1/r^2## relationship for circular orbits.

I am not sure what the author of your source is trying to show with Kepler's second law. You can find the derivation of centripetal force in any first year physics textbook: ##a_c = v^2/r = \omega^2 r##.

From Kepler's third law, ##r^3 \propto T^2 \text{ or } \frac{r^3}{T^2} = \text{ constant}##. Since ##\omega = 2\pi/T## this means that ##r^3\omega^2 = K## or ##\omega^2 = \frac{K}{r^3}##

The gravitational force provides the centripetal force required for circular orbit, so ##g=v^2/r = \omega^2 r##, this means that ##g = Kr/r^3 = K/r^2##

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TimeRip496
The angular velocity omega is r x v. The angular momentum vector is not even in the plane of the orbit. The angular momentum is normal to the plane of orbit. This source is clearly incorrect.
 
Sorry for the last post I was thinking of (specific) angular momentum not the angular velocity. I still think the source is unclear. A better explanation can be found in many textbooks.
 
mpresic said:
Sorry for the last post I was thinking of (specific) angular momentum not the angular velocity. I still think the source is unclear. A better explanation can be found in many textbooks.
Your first post was correct. The direction of ##\vec{\omega}## is in the same direction as the angular momentum vector: perpendicular to the plane of rotation:

(1) ##\vec{L} = I\vec{\omega}##

and for a point mass
(2) ##\vec{L} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p}##

so:
(3) ##\vec{\omega} = \frac{\vec{L}}{I} = \frac{\vec{r} \times \vec{p}}{I}##

Since, for a point mass: ##I = m|\vec{r}|^2##, for a point mass (3) can be rewritten:
##\vec{\omega} =\frac{\vec{r} \times \vec{p}}{m|\vec{r}|^2} = \frac{\vec{r} \times \vec{v}}{|\vec{r}|^2}##

I agree that the OP's source is incorrect in several other ways. Better to stick to reliable texts or online sites.

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K