Deriving Newtonian law of gravitation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the Newtonian law of gravitation, particularly in the context of circular orbits and the relationships defined by Kepler's laws. Participants are examining the validity of certain equations and their dimensional consistency.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the correctness of the equation $$\frac{\omega}{v}=\frac{s}{r}$$ and its implications for deriving gravitational laws. Some express confusion over the source material's clarity and mathematical steps. Others discuss the relationship between angular velocity and centripetal force, referencing Kepler's laws and their derivations.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between angular velocity, centripetal force, and gravitational force. Some participants have offered insights into deriving the relationship $$F \propto 1/r^2$$, while others emphasize the need for clarity in the source material. Multiple interpretations of the equations and their derivations are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original source may contain inaccuracies, leading to confusion in the derivation process. There is a general acknowledgment of the need for reliable references when discussing these concepts.

TimeRip496
Messages
249
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


upload_2016-5-29_21-48-53.png


Homework Equations


$$\frac{\omega}{v}=\frac{s}{r}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


How to get the equation above? Cause
$$\frac{s}{r}=\omega$$ & $$\frac{\omega}{v}=\frac{1}{r}$$ since v=rw.

Source: http://www.relativitycalculator.com/Newton_Universal_Gravity_Law.shtml
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TimeRip496 said:

Homework Statement


2. Homework Equations [/B]
$$\frac{\omega}{v}=\frac{s}{r}$$
This is not a correct equation. You can see that from the dimensions. LS = 1/distance and RS = distance / distance. Your source is not very well written and takes incomprehensible mathematical steps that appear to me to be wrong.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
This is not a correct equation. You can see that from the dimensions. LS = 1/distance and RS = distance / distance. Your source is not very well written and takes incomprehensible mathematical steps that appear to me to be wrong.

AM
Thanks! That's what I thought so. But without that step, I cannot continue and the subsequent steps that the source provides are useless in helping me to derive the Newtonian law of gravitation. Is there a correct way to derive the Newtonian laws of gravitation?
 
The author is trying to show how Kepler's laws lead to the ##F \propto 1/r^2## relationship for circular orbits.

I am not sure what the author of your source is trying to show with Kepler's second law. You can find the derivation of centripetal force in any first year physics textbook: ##a_c = v^2/r = \omega^2 r##.

From Kepler's third law, ##r^3 \propto T^2 \text{ or } \frac{r^3}{T^2} = \text{ constant}##. Since ##\omega = 2\pi/T## this means that ##r^3\omega^2 = K## or ##\omega^2 = \frac{K}{r^3}##

The gravitational force provides the centripetal force required for circular orbit, so ##g=v^2/r = \omega^2 r##, this means that ##g = Kr/r^3 = K/r^2##

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TimeRip496
The angular velocity omega is r x v. The angular momentum vector is not even in the plane of the orbit. The angular momentum is normal to the plane of orbit. This source is clearly incorrect.
 
Sorry for the last post I was thinking of (specific) angular momentum not the angular velocity. I still think the source is unclear. A better explanation can be found in many textbooks.
 
mpresic said:
Sorry for the last post I was thinking of (specific) angular momentum not the angular velocity. I still think the source is unclear. A better explanation can be found in many textbooks.
Your first post was correct. The direction of ##\vec{\omega}## is in the same direction as the angular momentum vector: perpendicular to the plane of rotation:

(1) ##\vec{L} = I\vec{\omega}##

and for a point mass
(2) ##\vec{L} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p}##

so:
(3) ##\vec{\omega} = \frac{\vec{L}}{I} = \frac{\vec{r} \times \vec{p}}{I}##

Since, for a point mass: ##I = m|\vec{r}|^2##, for a point mass (3) can be rewritten:
##\vec{\omega} =\frac{\vec{r} \times \vec{p}}{m|\vec{r}|^2} = \frac{\vec{r} \times \vec{v}}{|\vec{r}|^2}##

I agree that the OP's source is incorrect in several other ways. Better to stick to reliable texts or online sites.

AM
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K