MHB Deriving potential energy by simulation method

aruwin
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
The picture shows the potential due to ring charge.
Please show the full steps of deriving the equation of electrical potential. I don't know how to start at all.

NOTE:
The electric potential of the revolving symmetrical ring electric charge related to the axis z as depicted in the diagram 5.3, is also called a charged coil or a charged ring in the electromagnetism books, but most of the time, it gives an infinite series of equation that uses Legendre function. It is commonplace to use complete circle integral function in the charge simulation method. If the position (height) of ring electric charge is Z, the diameter is R, and the charge density is λ, the electric potential of the point P will be as represented in the next equation.

In the equation, l is the distance between the part of the ring charge dθ and P.
 

Attachments

  • potential due to ring charge.jpg
    potential due to ring charge.jpg
    27.3 KB · Views: 85
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi aruwin!

I may be a bit late, but if you're still interested...

What would the cartesian coordinates of a point on the ring be?

If you have that you can find the cartesian distance $l$ between the 2 points and substitute it in the formula that is given.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top