Deriving the effective potential due to screening

SkeZa
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm supposed to show that the Lindhard dielectric functions gives a contribution to the effective potential of a metals as

[tex]U_{eff}( \vec{r} )[/tex] [tex]\propto[/tex] [tex]\frac{cos( 2 k_{F}r)}{r^{3}}[/tex]

in the limit of [tex]r\rightarrow\infty[/tex] for d = 3 (3 dimensions)

Homework Equations



Lindhard dielectric function:
[tex]\epsilon(\vec{k},0) = 1 + \frac{\kappa^{2}_{TF}}{2k^{2}} ( 1 + \frac{1}{4k_{F}}\frac{4k^{2}_{F}-k^{2}}{2k}\ln \frac{2k_{F}+k}{2k_{F}-k}) = \epsilon(\vec{k})[/tex]

[tex]U_{eff}[/tex]([tex]\vec{k}[/tex]) = [tex]\frac{U(\vec{k})}{\epsilon(\vec{k},0)}[/tex]

[tex]U(\vec{k}) = \frac{4 \pi e^{2}}{k^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]U_{eff}(\vec{r})[/tex] is the inverse (spatial) Fourier transform of [tex]U_{eff}(\vec{k})[/tex]

[tex]k_{F}[/tex] is the Fermi wavevector

[tex]\kappa^{2}_{TF}[/tex] is the Thomas-Fermi wavevector (constant)

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried to Taylor expand [tex]\frac{1}{\epsilon(\vec{k})}[/tex] around [tex]2k_{F}[/tex] but the first derivative contains the logarithm which is divergent. I tried this because one of my classmates recommended it.

I tried to perform the Fourier transform by
[tex]U_{eff}(\vec{r}) \propto \int d\vec{k} e^{i \vec{k}\bullet\vec{r}}\frac{U(\vec{k})}{\epsilon(\vec{k},0)} \propto \int k^{2} dk d(cos(\theta)) d\phi e^{i k r cos(\theta)}\frac{U(\vec{k})}{\epsilon(\vec{k},0)} \propto \int k^{2} dk \frac{U(\vec{k})}{\epsilon(\vec{k},0)} \frac{e^{ikr} - e^{-ikr}}{ikr} \propto \frac{1}{r}\int dk \frac{1}{k \epsilon(\vec{k})} sin(kr)[/tex]

This is kinda where I'm stuck.
How do I proceed from here?
Or am I supposed to have done something else?
 
on Phys.org
The logarithm diverges, but it is multiplied by 0 (for the first term in the Taylor expansion).
 
I know that.

The problem is how to simplify/rewrite that expression (the last one) into something solveable...
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K