Deriving the EOM for Proca Lagrangian

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the equations of motion (EOM) for the Proca Lagrangian, specifically the expression L = -\frac{1}{16\pi}F^2 - \frac{1}{c}J_{\mu}A^{\mu} + \frac{M^2}{8\pi}A_{\mu}A^{\mu} in the Lorentz gauge. Participants clarify the Euler-Lagrange (E-L) equations, emphasizing the correct treatment of indices in covariant and contravariant components. The correct form of the E-L equation is established as \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial A^\sigma} - \partial_\sigma \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial F^{\rho\sigma}} \right) = 0\), with a clear distinction made regarding the placement of indices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Proca Lagrangian and its components
  • Familiarity with the Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Knowledge of covariant and contravariant indices in tensor calculus
  • Basic principles of classical field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equations in field theory
  • Learn about the implications of the Lorentz gauge in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the properties of covariant and contravariant tensors
  • Investigate the physical significance of the Proca Lagrangian in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and anyone studying classical field theory, particularly those focusing on gauge theories and the dynamics of vector fields.

a2009
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the Proca Lagrangian

L=-\frac{1}{16\pi}F^2-\frac{1}{c}J_{\mu}A^{\mu}+\frac{M^2}{8\pi}A_{\mu}A^{\mu}​

in the Lorentz gauge \partial_{\mu}A^{\mu}=0

Find the equation of motion.


Homework Equations



F^2=F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}


The Attempt at a Solution



Well, first of all I'm not quite sure how E-L should look in this case. Clearly F_{\mu\nu} is the part that is the derivatives of the dependent variables (A).
What I have gotten to is
\frac{\partial L}{\partial F_{\rho \sigma}} = -\frac{F^{\rho\sigma}}{8\pi}
\frac{\partial L}{\partial A_{\sigma}}=-\frac{1}{c} J^{\sigma} + \frac{M^2}{4 \pi}A^{\sigma}

So is this the E-L for 4D special relativity?
\frac{\partial L}{\partial A_\sigma}-\partial_\sigma \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial F_{\rho\sigma}} \right)=0​

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would more comfortable not taking a short-cut, i.e., I would expand the F's in term of A's, but, after substituting for the L's in your final equation, you seem to get the correct equation of motion.
 
Thanks so much for the quick reply.

What I'm mostly unsure about is how to formulate E-L in terms of covariant or contravariant components. Do I take the derivative with respect to A^\sigma or A_\sigma.

I guess my question could be reformulated as:

Should E-L look like
\frac{\partial L}{\partial A_\sigma}-\partial^\sigma \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial F_{\rho\sigma}} \right)=0​
or
\frac{\partial L}{\partial A^\sigma}-\partial_\sigma \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial F^{\rho\sigma}} \right)=0​

And based on what do I choose between the two?
 
Last edited:
a2009 said:
I guess my question could be reformulated as:

Should E-L look like
\frac{\partial L}{\partial A_\sigma}-\partial^\sigma \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial F_{\rho\sigma}} \right)=0​
or
\frac{\partial L}{\partial A^\sigma}-\partial_\sigma \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial F^{\rho\sigma}} \right)=0​

And based on what do I choose between the two?

Neither, :smile:. In each equation, \sigma is a free index in one term and a dummy summed index in the other term, which is a no-no. In terms of index placement, an upstairs index in a denominator is like a downstairs index in a numerator, and a downstairs index in a denominator is like an upstairs index in a numerator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K