Deriving the MTW version of the Einstein-Hilbert density

  • Thread starter Thread starter TerryW
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density deriving
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving Equation 21.90 from the MTW textbook using results from Alexey Golovnev's paper "ADM and massive gravity" (arXiv:1302.0687v4). The key identity under scrutiny is the equation involving the Einstein-Hilbert density: -2 √(-g)∇_μ(K^i_in^μ) = -2∂_0(√γK^i_i) + 2√γ^{(3)}∇_j(K^i_iN^j). The contributor identifies an extra term in their derivation and seeks assistance in eliminating it. The resolution is achieved by applying the divergence of a vector expression from MTW, leading to the conclusion that the surplus terms can be reduced to zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with general relativity concepts, particularly the Einstein-Hilbert action.
  • Understanding of the ADM formalism and its application in gravity theories.
  • Knowledge of tensor calculus and the properties of covariant derivatives.
  • Experience with the MTW textbook, specifically the equations related to the divergence of vectors.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Einstein-Hilbert density in detail from "ADM and massive gravity" by Alexey Golovnev.
  • Learn about the divergence of vectors in curved spacetime as presented in MTW, particularly Equation 21.85.
  • Explore the implications of the ADM formalism on massive gravity theories.
  • Review tensor calculus techniques to improve understanding of covariant derivatives and their applications.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in general relativity, and researchers working on gravitational theories, particularly those interested in the ADM formalism and its applications in massive gravity.

TerryW
Gold Member
Messages
234
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement



I've been working through a paper by Alexey Golovnev, title 'ADM and massive gravity' arXiv.1302.0687v4 [gr-qc] 26 March 2013. I am hoping to use his result for the Einstein-Hilbert density to achieve my aim of finding a way to derive Equation 21.90 in MTW. I have worked my way through the paper and can see that all the equations given are OK, with one crucial exception:

Homework Equations



The final link in the chain is this:

##-2 \sqrt{-g}\nabla_μ (K^i_in^μ) = -2∂_0(\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) + 2\sqrt{γ}^{(3)}\nabla_j(K^i_iN^j)##

My attempt to prove this identity ends up with an extra term. Can anyone tell me where I've gone wrong?

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the derivations in the paper:

##-2 \sqrt{-g}\nabla_μ (K^i_in^μ) = -2 \sqrt{-g}^{(4)}\nabla_0 (K^i_in^0) - 2 \sqrt{-g}^{(4)}\nabla_j (K^i_in^j)##

##= -2 ^{(4)}\nabla_0 (\sqrt{γ}NK^i_i\frac{1}{N}) - 2 \sqrt{-g}^{(4)}\nabla_j (K^i_in^j)##

##= -2 ^{(4)}\nabla_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) - 2 \sqrt{-g}[∂_j(K^i_in^j) + ^{(4)}Γ^j_{αj}(K^i_in^α)]##

##= -2 ∂_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) - 2 \sqrt{-g}∂_j(K^i_in^j) -2\sqrt{-g} ^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}(K^i_in^0) -2\sqrt{-g} ^{(4)}Γ^j_{kj}(K^i_in^k)##

##= -2 ∂_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) + 2 \sqrt{-g}∂_j(K^i_i\frac{N^j}{N}) -2\sqrt{-g} ^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}(K^i_i\frac{1}{N}) +2\sqrt{-g} ^{(4)}Γ^j_{kj}(K^i_i\frac{N^k}{N})##

##= -2 ∂_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) + 2 \sqrt{-g}∂_j(K^i_iN^j)(\frac{1}{N}) +2 \sqrt{-g}(K^i_iN^j)∂_j(\frac{1}{N})-2\sqrt{γ}N^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}(K^i_i\frac{1}{N})##
## +2\sqrt{γ} N^{(4)}Γ^j_{kj}(K^i_i\frac{N^k}{N})##

##= -2 ∂_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) + 2 \sqrt{γ}∂_j(K^i_iN^j) +2\sqrt{γ}^{(4)}Γ^j_{kj}K^i_iN^k+2\sqrt{-g}(K^i_iN^j)(\frac{-1}{N^2})∂_jN -2\sqrt{γ} ^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}(K^i_i)##

##= -2 ∂_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) + 2 \sqrt{γ}∂_j(K^i_iN^j) +2\sqrt{γ}(^{(3)}Γ^j_{kj} +\frac{N^j}{N}K_{jk})K^i_iN^k)-2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i(\frac{N^j}{N}∂_jN + ^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j})##

##= -2 ∂_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) + 2 \sqrt{γ}^{(3)}\nabla_j(K^i_iN^j) +2\sqrt{γ}\frac{N^j}{N}K_{jk}K^i_iN^k -2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i\frac{N^j}{N}∂_jN -2\sqrt{γ}K^i_{i}## ##^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}##

The first two terms are what I was aiming for. The three remaining terms are 'surplus' to requirements!

I can reduce these three terms down to just one as follows

##2\sqrt{γ}\frac{N^j}{N}K_{jk}K^i_iN^k -2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i\frac{N^j}{N}∂_jN -2\sqrt{γ}K^i_{i} ## ##^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}##

##= 2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i[\frac{N^j}{N}K_{jk}N^k -\frac{N^j}{N}∂_jN - ^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}]##

##= 2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i[\frac{N^j}{N}K_{jk}N^k -\frac{N^j}{N}∂_jN - [-\frac{N^j}{N}∂_jN -N(γ^{jk} - \frac{N^jN^k}{N^2})K_{jk} + ^{(3)}\nabla_j(N^j)]##

##= 2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i[Nγ^{jk}K_{jk} - ^{(3)}\nabla_j(N^j)]##

##= 2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i[Nγ^{jk}K_{jk} - γ^{jk}## ##^{(3)}\nabla_j(N_k)]##

##= -2\sqrt{γ}K^i_iγ^{jk}\,^{(4)}Γ_{k0j}##

I'd really appreciate it if someone can help me get rid of this last term!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
TerryW said:

Homework Statement



I've been working through a paper by Alexey Golovnev, title 'ADM and massive gravity' arXiv.1302.0687v4 [gr-qc] 26 March 2013. I am hoping to use his result for the Einstein-Hilbert density to achieve my aim of finding a way to derive Equation 21.90 in MTW. I have worked my way through the paper and can see that all the equations given are OK, with one crucial exception:

Homework Equations



The final link in the chain is this:

##-2 \sqrt{-g}\nabla_μ (K^i_in^μ) = -2∂_0(\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) + 2\sqrt{γ}^{(3)}\nabla_j(K^i_iN^j)##

My attempt to prove this identity ends up with an extra term. Can anyone tell me where I've gone wrong?

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the derivations in the paper:

##-2 \sqrt{-g}\nabla_μ (K^i_in^μ) = -2 \sqrt{-g}^{(4)}\nabla_0 (K^i_in^0) - 2 \sqrt{-g}^{(4)}\nabla_j (K^i_in^j)##

##= -2 ^{(4)}\nabla_0 (\sqrt{γ}NK^i_i\frac{1}{N}) - 2 \sqrt{-g}^{(4)}\nabla_j (K^i_in^j)##

##= -2 ^{(4)}\nabla_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) - 2 \sqrt{-g}[∂_j(K^i_in^j) + ^{(4)}Γ^j_{αj}(K^i_in^α)]##

##= -2 ∂_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) - 2 \sqrt{-g}∂_j(K^i_in^j) -2\sqrt{-g} ^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}(K^i_in^0) -2\sqrt{-g} ^{(4)}Γ^j_{kj}(K^i_in^k)##

##= -2 ∂_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) + 2 \sqrt{-g}∂_j(K^i_i\frac{N^j}{N}) -2\sqrt{-g} ^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}(K^i_i\frac{1}{N}) +2\sqrt{-g} ^{(4)}Γ^j_{kj}(K^i_i\frac{N^k}{N})##

##= -2 ∂_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) + 2 \sqrt{-g}∂_j(K^i_iN^j)(\frac{1}{N}) +2 \sqrt{-g}(K^i_iN^j)∂_j(\frac{1}{N})-2\sqrt{γ}N^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}(K^i_i\frac{1}{N})##
## +2\sqrt{γ} N^{(4)}Γ^j_{kj}(K^i_i\frac{N^k}{N})##

##= -2 ∂_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) + 2 \sqrt{γ}∂_j(K^i_iN^j) +2\sqrt{γ}^{(4)}Γ^j_{kj}K^i_iN^k+2\sqrt{-g}(K^i_iN^j)(\frac{-1}{N^2})∂_jN -2\sqrt{γ} ^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}(K^i_i)##

##= -2 ∂_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) + 2 \sqrt{γ}∂_j(K^i_iN^j) +2\sqrt{γ}(^{(3)}Γ^j_{kj} +\frac{N^j}{N}K_{jk})K^i_iN^k)-2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i(\frac{N^j}{N}∂_jN + ^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j})##

##= -2 ∂_0 (\sqrt{γ}K^i_i) + 2 \sqrt{γ}^{(3)}\nabla_j(K^i_iN^j) +2\sqrt{γ}\frac{N^j}{N}K_{jk}K^i_iN^k -2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i\frac{N^j}{N}∂_jN -2\sqrt{γ}K^i_{i}## ##^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}##

The first two terms are what I was aiming for. The three remaining terms are 'surplus' to requirements!

I can reduce these three terms down to just one as follows

##2\sqrt{γ}\frac{N^j}{N}K_{jk}K^i_iN^k -2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i\frac{N^j}{N}∂_jN -2\sqrt{γ}K^i_{i} ## ##^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}##

##= 2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i[\frac{N^j}{N}K_{jk}N^k -\frac{N^j}{N}∂_jN - ^{(4)}Γ^j_{0j}]##

##= 2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i[\frac{N^j}{N}K_{jk}N^k -\frac{N^j}{N}∂_jN - [-\frac{N^j}{N}∂_jN -N(γ^{jk} - \frac{N^jN^k}{N^2})K_{jk} + ^{(3)}\nabla_j(N^j)]##

##= 2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i[Nγ^{jk}K_{jk} - ^{(3)}\nabla_j(N^j)]## (***)

##= 2\sqrt{γ}K^i_i[Nγ^{jk}K_{jk} - γ^{jk}## ##^{(3)}\nabla_j(N_k)]##

##= -2\sqrt{γ}K^i_iγ^{jk}\,^{(4)}Γ_{k0j}##

I'd really appreciate it if someone can help me get rid of this last term!

Resolution

If I use the general expression for the divergence of a vector (MTW 21.85 p 579):

##(A^α)_{;α} = \sqrt{-g}^{-½}(\sqrt{-g}A^α)_{,α}##

and then work on ##K_{ij} = -^{(4)}\nabla_in_j## (Golovnev (2)), I find that

##g^{ij}K_{ij} = K^i_i = -g^{ij}## ##^{(4)}\nabla_i n_j## ## = -^{(4)}\nabla_i n^i##

So ##\sqrt{-g}K^i_i = \sqrt{-g}^{(4)}\nabla_i\frac{N^i}{N} = (\sqrt{-g}\frac{N^i}{N})_{,i} = (\sqrtγN^i)_{,i}##

Now use the general expression for the divergence of a vector in the 3-D space

##^{(3)}\nabla_iA^i = \sqrtγ^{-½}(\sqrtγA^i)_{,i}## ...(1)

So ##\sqrtγNK^i_i = (\sqrtγN^i)_{,i} = \sqrtγ^{(3)}\nabla_iN^i##

So ##NK^i_i = ^{(3)}\nabla_iN^i##

which means that (***) above = 0, which achieves my aim of getting rid of the 'surplus to requirements' terms.This resolution was prompted by TSny, who sent me a much more elegant solution, again based on MTW 21.85 as follows;

## \sqrt{-g}^{(4)}\nabla_μ (K^i_in^μ) = (\sqrt{-g}(K^i_in^0)_{,0} - \sqrt{-g}K^i_in^j)_{j}##

##∴\sqrt{-g}^{(4)}\nabla_μ (K^i_in^μ) = (\frac {\sqrt{-g}}{N}K^i_i)_{,0} - (\frac {\sqrt{-g}}{N}K^i_iN^j)_{,j}##

Then using (1) and ##\sqrt{-g} = \sqrtγN##

##\sqrt{-g}^{(4)}\nabla_μ (K^i_in^μ) = (\sqrtγK^i_i)_{,0} - \sqrtγ^{(3)}\nabla_j(K^i_iN^j)##

QED!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nrqed

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K