Deriving the Planck Length, Time, and Mass

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Planck length, Planck time, and Planck mass are derived from three fundamental constants: the speed of light (c), Planck's constant (\hbar), and the universal gravitational constant (G). These constants are defined based on arbitrary base units of length, mass, and time, which can be adjusted to make these constants equal to one in a new unit system, known as Planck units. The discussion emphasizes that while these units can be viewed as standards, they are fundamentally conceptual, reflecting the intrinsic properties of the universe rather than merely serving as measurement standards.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fundamental physical constants: speed of light (c), Planck's constant (\hbar), and gravitational constant (G)
  • Familiarity with unit systems such as SI and CGS
  • Basic knowledge of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Conceptual grasp of measurement standards and their implications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of Planck units and their significance in theoretical physics
  • Explore the implications of redefining base units in measurement systems
  • Study the relationship between Planck units and quantum gravity theories
  • Investigate experimental methods for measuring fundamental constants, including Cavendish experiments and Watt balances
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the foundations of measurement in science, particularly those exploring quantum mechanics and general relativity.

Saketh
Messages
258
Reaction score
2
How are the Planck length, Planck time, and Planck mass "derived"?

I know their values, but I don't understand where we get them from.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it's similar to how the "Newton" was chosen to be exactly the force that would accelerate 1 kg of mass at a rate of 1 m/s2. in the SI or cgs systems, they start with a sort of arbitrary (from a universal POV) definition of unit length, unit mass, and unit time, and given those definitions, they naturally derive a unit of velocity, unit momentum, unit force, unit energy, etc.

then, given that set of units (pre-1960) physicists went out and measured a bunch of stuff including 3 universal constants intrinsic to free-space, that is the speed of E&M propagation c, Planck's constant \hbar, and the universal gravitational constant G.

remember that these constants take on the numbers that they do because of the 3 arbitrary base units we came up with to measure them. so if we chose to, we could choose the 3 base units (and adjust the consequential derived units) so that those three constants c, \hbar, and G all take on the value "1" in terms of those units. that is what Planck units are.

check it out in the Wikipedia. at least the hard-core POV pushers haven't f*cked that one up too much.
 
I once saw a problem which asked to "derive" the Planck units. Your explanation makes sense -- that the units are just a standard -- but are the units a logical outgrowth of a previous scientific result? Or are they nothing more than a standard?
 
Saketh said:
I once saw a problem which asked to "derive" the Planck units. Your explanation makes sense -- that the units are just a standard -- but are the units a logical outgrowth of a previous scientific result? Or are they nothing more than a standard?

the units are more "conceptual" than a standard, although i suppose one could treat them as a standard if they want to have a Cavendish-like apparatus for measuring G, a Watt-balance for measuring \hbar and a Michaelson-like thing (including a mirror on a mountain some distance away) for measuring c in terms of existing temporary standards like a cesium-clock, platinum-iridium prototype meter bar, and prototype mass. if we measure these constants in terms of the temporary standards, then we can say how those temp standards stack up in relation to the Planck units.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
848
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K