Undergrad Deriving the spherical volume element

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the infinitesimal volume element in spherical coordinates, specifically aiming to express it as ##r^{2}\sin\theta dr d\theta d\phi##. The initial approach using Cartesian coordinates and expanding the volume element ##dxdydz## is deemed invalid due to the failure to account for the actual volumes spanned by the basis vectors in spherical coordinates. The correct method involves using the triple product of the basis vectors or the wedge product of differentials, emphasizing the anti-symmetry of the wedge product to avoid terms like ##dr^{3}##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spherical coordinates and their transformations
  • Familiarity with Cartesian coordinates and volume elements
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, specifically triple products
  • Basic understanding of differential forms and wedge products
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of volume elements in different coordinate systems
  • Learn about the properties and applications of wedge products in differential geometry
  • Explore vector calculus techniques, particularly the triple product and its geometric interpretations
  • Review the integration and differentiation processes in spherical coordinates as outlined on Wikipedia
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students who are working with spherical coordinates and need to understand volume elements in advanced calculus or differential geometry contexts.

quickAndLucky
Messages
32
Reaction score
3
I’m trying to derive the infinitesimal volume element in spherical coordinates. Obviously there are several ways to do this. The way I was attempting it was to start with the cartesian volume element, dxdydz, and transform it using

$$dxdydz = \left (\frac{\partial x}{\partial r}dr + \frac{\partial x}{\partial \theta }d\theta + \frac{\partial x}{\partial \phi }d\phi \right )\left ( \frac{\partial y}{\partial r}dr + \frac{\partial y}{\partial \theta }d\theta + \frac{\partial y }{\partial \phi}d\phi \right )\left ( \frac{\partial z}{\partial r}dr + \frac{\partial z}{\partial \theta }d\theta + \frac{\partial z}{\partial \phi}d\phi \right )$$

Unfortunately, I can’t see how I will arrive at the correct expression, ##r^{2}sin\theta drd\theta d\phi ##.

For one reason, when completely expanded, I get terms with repeated differentials like ##dr^{3} ## that don’t cancel.

Why is my method of derivation invalid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are not looking at the volumes actually spanned by the basis vectors corresponding to the spherical coordinates. The volume element spanned by three vectors ##\vec a_i## is the triple product ##\vec a_1 \cdot (\vec a_2 \times \vec a_3)##. Hence, if you look at the volume of a small parallelepiped spanned by the coordinate lines with coordinate differences ##dy^i##, then this is given by
$$
dV = \frac{\partial \vec x}{\partial y^1} \cdot \left(\frac{\partial \vec x}{\partial y^2} \times \frac{\partial \vec x}{\partial y^3}\right) dy^1 dy^2 dy^3.
$$

Alternatively, the volume element can be seen as the wedge product between the differentials. You must then remember that the wedge product is completely anti-symmetric and therefore anything like ##dr\wedge dr = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes quickAndLucky and BvU
Thanks for the help! Using a wedge between the terms in my original expression got me to the answer!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K