Deriving Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric from LEFEs

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the weak-field Schwarzschild metric using Linearized Einstein's Field Equations (LEFEs). The equations presented include the energy-momentum tensor Tμν for a static, spherically symmetric case and the corresponding metric perturbations hμν. The participant identifies discrepancies in their calculations, particularly regarding the sign of the right-hand side of the equations, which should yield a positive result for the weak-field Schwarzschild metric. The final solution derived is -2Gm/Rc², contrasting with the expected +4Gm/Rc² from established literature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Linearized Einstein's Field Equations (LEFEs)
  • Understanding of the Schwarzschild metric
  • Knowledge of tensor calculus
  • Familiarity with the energy-momentum tensor in general relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the Schwarzschild metric in general relativity
  • Study the implications of the energy-momentum tensor Tμν in different scenarios
  • Learn about the significance of signs in differential equations in physics
  • Explore LaTeX for scientific writing to accurately present mathematical derivations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers focusing on general relativity and gravitational theories will benefit from this discussion.

Nikhil Hadap
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
I am trying to derive weak-field Schwarzschild metric using Linearized Einstein's field equations of gravity:

[]hμν – 1/2 ημν []hγγ = -16πG/ c4 Tμν

For static, spherically symmetrical case, the Energy- momentum tensor:

Tμν = diag { ρc2 , 0, 0, 0 }

Corresponding metric perturbations for static ortho-normal coordinates:

hμν = diag { htt , hxx , hyy , hzz }

With one index rised using flat space-time Minquoskwi metric ημν= { -1 , 1, 1, 1 }:

hμν = diag { -htt , hxx , hyy , hzz }

Trace of the metric:

h = hγγ = - htt + hxx + hyy + hzz

The four equations:

1) []htt – 1/2 ηtt []hγγ = -16πG/ c4 Ttt

=> []htt + 1/2 []( - htt + hxx + hyy + hzz )= -16πGρ/ c2

=> 1/2 []( htt + hxx + hyy + hzz )= -16πGρ/ c2

2) []hxx – 1/2 ηxx []hγγ = -16πG/ c4 Txx

=> []hxx - 1/2 []( - htt + hxx + hyy + hzz )= 0

=> 1/2 []( htt + hxx - hyy - hzz )= 0

Similarly:

3) 1/2 []( htt - hxx + hyy - hzz )= 0

4) 1/2 []( htt - hxx - hyy + hzz )= 0

Adding equations 2), 3) & 4) to 1) respectively, yield:

[]( htt + hxx ) = []( htt + hyy ) = []( htt + hzz )= -16πGρ/ c2

Solving the equations using:

[] ≈ ▼2 ≈ 1/R2 d/ dR ( R2 d/ dR ) for static spherically symmetric case; we get:

( htt + hxx ) = ( htt + hyy ) = ( htt + hzz )= -8πGρR2 / 3c2 – K1/ R + K2

Similar solutions for vacuum case, with Tμν= 0 would be:

( htt + hxx ) = ( htt + hyy ) = ( htt + hzz )= – K1'/ R + K2'

For the metric to be asymptotically flat:

K2 = K2' = 0

For the solutions to be continuous at boundary, R= r, the radius of spherically symmetric matter:

- 8πGρr2 / 3c2 ≈ - 2Gm/ rc2

The remaining two constants must be:

K1 = 0 & K1' = 2Gm/ Rc2

Therefore, the complete solution becomes:

( htt + hxx ) = ( htt + hyy ) = ( htt + hzz )= - 2Gm/ Rc2

But, as per the literature, the weak field Schwarzschild metric must be:

( htt + hxx ) = ( htt + hyy ) = ( htt + hzz )= + 4Gm/ Rc2

I am not able to make out where I am making mistake. Can anybody please help?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It really helps you more to learn about LaTex scientific writing software than how to derive a solution to a differential equation...
 
Nikhil Hadap said:
Linearized Einstein's field equations of gravity:

[]hμν – 1/2 ημν []hγγ = -16πG/ c4 Tμν

To compare with the literature, I think you need a + sign on the RHS.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K