Derive Escape Velocity GR: Source for Schwarzschild Metric

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of escape velocity in the context of General Relativity (GR), specifically using the Schwarzschild metric. Participants explore the similarities and differences between the classical and relativistic formulations of escape velocity, as well as seek sources for further understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the formula for escape velocity for a spherical mass is the same in relativity as in classical physics, expressed as v_e = (2GM/r)^{1/2}.
  • Another participant requests sources for deriving this formula, suggesting that it involves taking a radial geodesic from rest at infinity using the Schwarzschild metric.
  • A participant mentions that many GR textbooks include this as a homework problem.
  • One participant provides a specific reference to Carroll's lecture notes for the geodesic equation, indicating relevant equations for further study.
  • Another participant shares a link to a set of lecture notes that contain the necessary information.
  • One participant claims that the escape velocity differs from the Newtonian result by a factor of (1 - r_{s}/r), based on their calculations using equations from a Wikipedia page on Schwarzschild geodesics.
  • A later reply challenges this claim, stating that the original formula for escape velocity is indeed correct and that the calculations presented do not yield the physical escape velocity.
  • Another participant expresses concern about their findings, noting that their formula for escape velocity results in zero at the surface of a Schwarzschild black hole.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the relativistic and classical formulations of escape velocity, with some asserting they are the same while others suggest a modification is necessary. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of escape velocity in the relativistic context.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved mathematical steps in the derivation of escape velocity, particularly concerning the interpretation of coordinate velocity versus physical velocity in the context of GR.

snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
TL;DR
Wondering how to find the escape velocity formula consistent with relativity.
I was surprised to read that the formula for escape velocity — at least for a spherical mass like the Earth — is the same in relativity as it is in classical physics:
<br /> v_e = (2GM/r)^{1/2}<br />
I'm wondering if someone can give me a good source for deriving this. (I assume one takes a radial geodesic starting at rest from infinity using the Schwarzschild metric and finding its velocity at radius r?) Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
snoopies622 said:
I'm wondering if someone can give me a good source for deriving this.

Many GR textbooks give this as a homework problem.

snoopies622 said:
(I assume one takes a radial geodesic starting at rest from infinity using the Schwarzschild metric and finding its velocity at radius r?)

Yes.
 
Thanks Peter, actually I was hoping for a link to something on the internet since my college physics library is still semi-closed due to the Covid-19.
 
Carroll's lecture notes, around equations 7.43 to 7.48 for the geodesic equation. Read back a bit for definitions of ##E##, ##L##, ##\epsilon##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dsaun777 and snoopies622
Epilogue:

I had forgotten about this, but using a couple equations found here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_geodesics

and substituting, I get that the escape velocity isn't exactly the same as the Newtonian result (see OP) but differs by a factor (1 - r_{s}/r).

All I did was find E by setting dr/dT = 0, h (angular momentum) =0 and r=infinity in the given

<br /> \frac {dr}{dT} = E^2/m^2 c^2 - (1 - r_{s}/r)(c^2 + h^2 / r^2)<br />

and then let v^2 = (dr/dT)^2 / (dt/dT)^2

with (1 - r_{s}/r) = (dt/dT) (E/mc^2)
 
snoopies622 said:
using a couple equations found here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_geodesics

and substituting, I get that the escape velocity isn't exactly the same as the Newtonian result (see OP) but differs by a factor (1 - r_{s}/r).
This is not correct. The formula in your OP is correct.

snoopies622 said:
All I did was find E by setting dr/dT = 0, h (angular momentum) =0 and r=infinity in the given

<br /> \frac {dr}{dT} = E^2/m^2 c^2 - (1 - r_{s}/r)(c^2 + h^2 / r^2)<br />

and then let v^2 = (dr/dT)^2 / (dt/dT)^2

with (1 - r_{s}/r) = (dt/dT) (E/mc^2)
That doesn't give you escape velocity. Escape velocity is just ##dr / dT##. What you are calculating here, ##dr / dt##, is just a coordinate velocity and has no direct physical meaning.
 
Thanks Peter, I'm relieved to hear this since i just noticed that my dr/dt formula gives an escape velocity of zero at the surface of a Schwarzschild black hole!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K