Description of imaging through lens using quantized EM field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the imaging processes through lenses at the single photon level, specifically focusing on the need for a quantized electromagnetic (EM) field description. Participants explore the implications of quantum mechanical measurement backaction on the wave function of atoms emitting photons and seek relevant literature on the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that imaging at the single photon level necessitates the use of a quantized electromagnetic field to accurately describe the process.
  • Another participant argues that a classical treatment suffices for typical imaging processes, suggesting that quantization is only necessary for nonclassical light sources.
  • A later reply questions the relevance of the quantum mechanical measurement backaction for imaging purposes, citing the complexity of identifying which atom is responsible for photon emission.
  • One participant mentions the context of ultracold-atom experiments, where small groups of atoms are trapped and observed, linking this to imaging techniques like quantum gas microscopy.
  • References to specific literature, such as the book by Mandel and Wolf and a paper on quantum gas microscopy, are provided to support various claims and to guide further exploration of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether a quantized electromagnetic field is necessary for imaging processes at the single photon level. There is no consensus on the relevance of quantum mechanical measurement backaction for imaging purposes, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the measurement backaction and its implications for imaging, as well as the dependence on specific experimental setups and definitions of light sources.

zxontt
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Usually the imaging through lens is described using geometrical optics or wave optics. However, I wish to study some imaging processes through lens where the light intensity is at the single photon level, under which condition I think the correct description should use a quantized electromagnetic (EM) field. To be more specific, I want to investigate the quantum mechanical measurement backaction of detection of single photons (at the image screen) back on the wave function of the atoms (on the object plane) emitting the photons. Are there some textbooks or research papers that gives a description of the imaging process of lens with the electromagnetic field quantized?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zxontt said:
at the single photon level, under which condition I think the correct description should use a quantized electromagnetic (EM) field.
No. You only need to treat the classical intensity as a rate of photon impact in a classical stochastic process.

The quantized field is needed only if you work with nonclassical light sources (squeezed states, parametric down-conversion, etc) , which is not the case for typical imaging processes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
A. Neumaier said:
No. You only need to treat the classical intensity as a rate of photon impact in a classical stochastic process.

The quantized field is needed only if you work with nonclassical light sources (squeezed states, parametric down-conversion, etc) , which is not the case for typical imaging processes.
Sorry for not having been more specific. I fully agree if the intensity is the quantity of interest, classical treatment would suffice. But actually I want to investigate the quantum mechanical measurement backaction of detection of single photons at the image screen back on the wave function of the atoms on the object plane emitting the photons. So is it correct that a description using quantized electromagnetic field will be needed?
 
zxontt said:
backaction of detection of single photons at the image screen back on the wave function of the atoms on the object plane emitting the photons.
This is a huge, probably untractable multiparticle problem since it is by no means clear which atom is responsible for the emission. I cannot imagine that this can be relvant for imaging purposes. (If you want to waste your time you can look at the book on quantum optics by Mandel and Wolf to see some of what is needed to model what you want.)
 
A. Neumaier said:
This is a huge, probably untractable multiparticle problem since it is by no means clear which atom is responsible for the emission. I cannot imagine that this can be relvant for imaging purposes. (If you want to waste your time you can look at the book on quantum optics by Mandel and Wolf to see some of what is needed to model what you want.)

Thanks for the recommendation. I am having in mind small bunch of atoms like in ultracold-atom experiments where a very small number of atoms are trapped and observed.
 
zxontt said:
Thanks for the recommendation. I am having in mind small bunch of atoms like in ultracold-atom experiments where a very small number of atoms are trapped and observed.
Then what does it have to do with imaging?
 
The atoms in
A. Neumaier said:
Then what does it have to do with imaging?
The atoms in these ultracold experiments are observed by imaging the atoms through a lens so as to determine their position. This is a quite hot topic recently, called quantum gas microscope. For example cf. this paper: Bakr, Waseem S., et al. "A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice." Nature 462.7269 (2009): 74-77. But the measurement backaction of imaging is less considered, and up to now never investigated experimentally according to my best knowledge. Though it seems that the technique is already adequate.
 
zxontt said:
The atoms in

The atoms in these ultracold experiments are observed by imaging the atoms through a lens so as to determine their position. This is a quite hot topic recently, called quantum gas microscope. For example cf. this paper: Bakr, Waseem S., et al. "A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice." Nature 462.7269 (2009): 74-77. But the measurement backaction of imaging is less considered, and up to now never investigated experimentally according to my best knowledge. Though it seems that the technique is already adequate.
Thanks; this gives enough context to discuss the matter. I'll come back to you after having looked more closely at the article.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
846
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
512
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
11K