Destructive interference in wavelengths question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the minimum nonzero thickness of a nonreflective coating (n = 1.24) on a camera lens glass (n = 1.52) to achieve destructive interference for yellow-green light (wavelength = 564 nm). The correct approach involves determining the wavelength of light in the coating as 454.84 nm and using the formula for destructive interference, which accounts for phase shifts. The final correct thickness found is 341.13 nm after adjusting for the wave shift across the coating.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave optics and interference principles
  • Familiarity with refractive indices and their implications
  • Knowledge of wavelength calculations in different media
  • Proficiency in solving equations involving multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of wave interference in optics
  • Learn about the effects of refractive index on wavelength
  • Explore advanced topics in thin film interference
  • Investigate practical applications of nonreflective coatings in optics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, physicists, and engineers working with optical devices, particularly those involved in lens design and coating technologies.

StudentofPhysics
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
1. A nonreflective coating (n = 1.24) covers the glass (n = 1.52) of a camera lens. Assuming that the coating prevents reflection of yellow-green light (wavelength in vacuum = 564 nm), determine the minimum nonzero thickness that the coating can have.




2. wavelength of the light in the coating = wavelngth of light / n of coating

desructive interference: 2t = (1,2...) wavelngth coating
t=thickness




3. OK the wavelngth of the light through the coating is: 564/1.24 = 454.84

I figured maybe that was all i needed and attempted to find t.

2t=1(454.84)
t= 227.42

this was not correct, so I next proceded to find the wavelength once through the film to the glass:

454.84/1.52 = 299.24 nm

The destructive interference for this is:

2t = (1) 299.24
t= 149.62 nm

This too was incorrect.

I even tried plugging in the original wavelength of 564 nm with the n of glass; 1.52, then solving for t. This gave me:

564/1.52 = 371.05
2t= (1) 371.05
t= 185.53


None of these were correct.

Any thoughts on where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I've made some progress:

Since there are 2 1/2 wave shifts then the equation should be:

2t + 1 wavelength in film = (1/2) wavelength in film

this gave me an answer of 341.13 nm for t and is still incorrect though.
 
Ok nevermind I finally figured it out. I was adding the wave shift across the sides of the formula rather than subtracting it like I should have.

Thanks to those who considered it for me though. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
8K