Detecting an Ancient Civilization's satellite?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Archaeopteryx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellite
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of detecting ancient satellites from civilizations that may have existed thousands of years ago. It is concluded that satellites in low Earth orbit would have decayed due to atmospheric drag, while those in higher orbits are likely unstable without regular maintenance. Current technology struggles to detect small objects in space, making the identification of ancient satellites highly unlikely. The moon's long-term orbit is noted as a contrast, but it does not prove that artificial satellites could survive for similar durations. Overall, the consensus is that the existence of such ancient satellites is improbable and detection would be challenging.
Archaeopteryx
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If an ancient civilization were to have great lost technology and had previously shot satellites into orbit would they still be orbiting today, and if so would we be able to detect them without previous knowledge of them? Say 6,0000BC, 10,000BC, 15,000BC, 20k+BC? for the civilization times. I was just wondering if longevity can be reached for the longnin orbit.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Unlikely. Anything in low Earth orbit would have succumbed to drag already, and while I don't know for sure, I think that the larger orbits are fairly unstable over long periods of time. I would also limit discussion on anything about ancient civilizations having advanced technology, as that is almost guaranteed to be an topic that is off-limits per PF rules.
 
according to wikipedia, nearly all orbits require "station-keeping" which amounts to small amounts of thrust over time to compensate for perturbations due to air-drag, solar wind, the gravitational field of the moon, etc.

so unless these satellites had enough fuel in them to maintain station-keeping processes for such long amounts of time, then I doubt many would survive their parent civilizations

as for detecting them... sounds highly unlikely based on our current technology. Right now we have a moderately difficult time detecting just planets. I'm not sure it would be easy to notice tiny little satellites from so many light-years away
 
The LAGEOS satellites' orbits are expected to take 8 million years to naturally decay (in the absence of, e.g., collisions with man-made junk) JPL website on LAGEOS. I think we would know if anything like that were anywhere near Earth (at least if it were near enough to be in a stable orbit around the Earth).
 
The moon is a satellite that has been orbiting Earth for a long time, so it certainly is possible. However, the overwhelming majority of our current satellites are used for communications, and those are only useful in a low Earth or geostationary orbit. Without some kind of automated system to make adjustments, they would most likely decay. If they have not decayed, we should be able to locate them with current technology although we would likely just think they were a piece of space junk.
 
vociferous said:
The moon is a satellite that has been orbiting Earth for a long time, so it certainly is possible.

The existence of the moon in orbit after 4 billion years isn't quite proof that an artificial satellite could do the same, even if it is only for 20k years or so.
 
Drakkith said:
Unlikely. Anything in low Earth orbit would have succumbed to drag already, and while I don't know for sure, I think that the larger orbits are fairly unstable over long periods of time.
If by unstable you mean that satellites don't stay in the exact orbits we want it to be in for long, that is correct. If you mean it won't be in orbit at all, that is incorrect. A satellite in geosynchronous orbit is too deep in the Earth's gravity well for anything to kick it out.

Unless it collides with another satellite in geosynchronous orbit, that is. Collisions are a real possibility since things in geosynchronous orbit tend to drift toward either 75.3°E or 104.7°W.


I would also limit discussion on anything about ancient civilizations having advanced technology, as that is almost guaranteed to be an topic that is off-limits per PF rules.
You are without a doubt correct in this regard.

Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K