Detecting Neutral Super-Partner Particles

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter indigojoker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutral Particles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the detectability of neutral super-partner particles in the context of supersymmetry (SUSY) and their potential implications for particle physics and dark matter. Participants explore the challenges associated with detecting neutral particles compared to charged ones, as well as the theoretical frameworks surrounding these particles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether detectors can pick up neutral super-partner particles, comparing them to neutrinos in terms of detectability.
  • It is noted that all neutral particles are generally harder to detect than charged particles, with detection depending on specific collision possibilities.
  • There is a suggestion that if neutral super-partner particles are stable, they would not be directly detectable and would manifest as missing energy in collisions.
  • Others introduce the concept of WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles) as potentially related to stable superparticles and candidates for dark matter.
  • One participant asserts that the lightest neutral super-symmetric particles would lead to large missing transverse energy if they are stable and R parity is conserved.
  • Another point raised is that detection may rely on observing the disintegration products of these particles rather than the particles themselves.
  • It is mentioned that experimental detection of charged decay products can allow for the reconstruction of invariant mass, which may suggest the presence of a decaying particle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the detectability of neutral super-partner particles, with no consensus reached on the methods or implications of detection. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of detection and the characteristics of these particles.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the stability of the particles, the assumptions regarding R parity conservation, and the specific conditions under which detection might occur.

indigojoker
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
If SUSY particles existed, is it possible for detectors to pick up on neutral super-partner particles? or would they pass the detector like neutrinos?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All neutral particles are harder to detect than charged particles. There is no general rule - each particle is detectable by its specific collision possibilities.
 
If they are stable, they would not be detectable and would appear as missing energy in a collision. If not, they would decay into other particles which could be detectable.
 
There is a related concept: WIMP, a Weakly Interacting Massive Particle. Not sure if it is the same than the stable, not decaying, superparticle. Candidates for dark matter.
 
Indeed, the lightest neutral super-symmetric particles particles would appear as large missing transverse energy in the case where they are stable (when R parity is conserved).

Adrian Buzatu, Clubul Fizica Particulelor, http://fizicaparticulelor.ro
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We do not expect to detect the particle but its disintegration products and/or the cross-sectiond of the colision process.
 
Indeed, we can detected experimentally the charged decay products and reconstruct an invariant mass for different decay products, for many experiments and if in many cases we obtain more or less the same value, we could guess there is a particle with a distribution of invariant mass that is decaying into the daughter particles that we detect.

Adrian Buzatu, Clubul Fizica Particulelor http://fizicaparticulelor.ro
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K