If only it was a voting game ...Meir Achuz said:
I tried to include things like this in 1 with the ”otherwise hidden” to not make it too long …Vanadium 50 said:
Super-symmetric particles have not been discovered yet because they are predicted to be much heavier than the particles we have already discovered. This means that they would require higher energies to produce, which have not yet been achieved in experiments.
No, super-symmetric particles are not ruled out by current experiments. While no direct evidence of super-symmetry has been found, the theory is still considered a viable possibility to explain some of the mysteries in particle physics.
If super-symmetric particles are never discovered, it would mean that the theory of super-symmetry is incorrect or incomplete. This would lead to a reevaluation of our understanding of fundamental particles and forces in the universe.
It is possible that super-symmetric particles could be hiding in plain sight, but are simply too difficult to detect with current experimental methods. Scientists continue to search for new ways to probe for these elusive particles.
The discovery of super-symmetric particles would have profound implications for our understanding of the universe. It could help explain the existence of dark matter, unify the forces of nature, and provide new insights into the fundamental structure of the universe.