Determine a formula for (RE: vector valued functions)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the formula for the derivative of the dot product of a vector-valued function \( r(t) \) with the cross product of its first and second derivatives, \( r' \) and \( r'' \). The correct approach utilizes the product rule, yielding the formula \( \frac{d}{dt}[r \cdot (r' \times r'')] = r' \cdot (r' \times r'') + r \cdot (r' + r'')' \). Participants clarify that the initial assumption of treating dot products as vectors is incorrect, emphasizing the need for proper vector calculus techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector-valued functions (v.v.f)
  • Familiarity with derivatives and the product rule in calculus
  • Knowledge of cross products and dot products in vector algebra
  • Basic proficiency in vector calculus concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the product rule in vector calculus in detail
  • Learn about the properties of cross products and their applications
  • Explore vector-valued functions and their derivatives
  • Investigate advanced topics in vector calculus, such as the chain rule for vector functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying vector calculus or working with vector-valued functions in applied mathematics.

WalkingInMud
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Let r(t) be a v.v.f -with the first and second derivatives r' and r''. Determine formula for
d/dt [r.(r' x r'')] -in terms of r:

How do we approach this one?

maybe:
d/dt [r.(r' x r'')] = d/dt [r.r' x r.r''] = ((r'.r' + r.r'') x r'.r'') + (r.r' x (r'.r'' + r.r''')) ??
...and then what?

Is anyone able to give me a starting point -- or starting direction? -- thanks heaps
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WalkingInMud said:
Let r(t) be a v.v.f -with the first and second derivatives r' and r''. Determine formula for
d/dt [r.(r' x r'')] -in terms of r:

How do we approach this one?

maybe:
d/dt [r.(r' x r'')] = d/dt [r.r' x r.r''] = ((r'.r' + r.r'') x r'.r'') + (r.r' x (r'.r'' + r.r''')) ??
...and then what?

Is anyone able to give me a starting point -- or starting direction? -- thanks heaps
What you have now doesn't make sense. r.r' is a number, not a vector. Same thing for r.r". You can't take the cross product. You seem to be assuming that u.(v x w)= (u.v)x(u.w) and, as I just said, that product doesn't make sense.

How about jusst using the product rule:
d/dt[r.(r' x r")]= r'.(r'x r")+ r.(r'+ r")'. The first term is easy: (r' x r") is perpendicular to both r' and r" so its dot product with r' is ?

Now expand (r' x r")' in the same way. Again, the first part of the sum is trivial.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K