Determine electric field at x=1m

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the electric field from a given electric potential function, V=ax^2+bx+c, with specific coefficients. The original poster seeks to find the electric field at x=1m and the position where the electric field is zero.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between electric potential and electric field, questioning the validity of equating potential and field values. There are attempts to clarify the correct mathematical relationships and the implications of the negative sign in the electric field equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring various interpretations of the relationships between electric potential and electric field. Some participants are providing clarifications regarding the equations involved, while others are questioning their understanding of the concepts. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive guidance is being shared.

Contextual Notes

Participants are addressing potential misconceptions regarding the units of electric potential and electric field, as well as the specific conditions under which certain equations apply. The original poster's assumptions about the relationship between V and E are being critically examined.

jaydnul
Messages
558
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


A. The electric potential in a certain region is
[tex]V=ax^2+bx+c[/tex]
where [itex]a=13\frac{V}{m^2}[/itex], [itex]b=-14\frac{V}{m}[/itex], and [itex]c=50V[/itex].

Determine the electric field at [itex]x=1m[/itex].
Answer in units of [itex]\frac{V}{m}[/itex].

B. Determine the position where the electric field is zero. Answer in units of m.

Homework Equations


[itex]∫Edx=V[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Well V=49. I have no doubt about that. So if V is 49 at x=1, wouldn't the electric field also be 49 at x=1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no reason why the electric field should have the same numerical value as the potential.
Note that this comparison has no physical meaning anyway - potential and field have different units.
 
[itex]E=\frac{V}{r}[/itex]. [itex]\frac{49}{1}=49[/itex]. What am I doing wrong?
 
E=V/r is not right.
E is the derivative of V.
 
Oh wow. So [itex]V=k\frac{Q}{r}[/itex] isn't correct?
 
Jd0g33 said:
Oh wow. So [itex]V=k\frac{Q}{r}[/itex] isn't correct?

Not for this problem. [itex]V=k\frac{Q}{r}[/itex] only applies for situations involving spherical charge symmetry, like a point charge.
 
Oh, and don't forget that there is a negative sign involved in the relationship between electric potential and electric field. The equation that you listed in the "Relevant Equations" section erroneously neglects this.
 
Perfect, thank you guys
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
798
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K