MHB Determine how many times are of PQR in terms of XYZ

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
001.jpg


If that's not clear enough, DIAGRAM this will do it.

Going Ahead I see that,

Line PQ is bisected by the parallel line which originates from X

Parallel line which originates from X is parallel to the line PQ

QY=YZ=ZR

and using the converse of the midpoint theorem

The straight line through the midpoint of one side of a triangle and parallel to another side,bisects the third side.

$$\therefore$$ PX = XR (converse of the midpoint theorem)

And We know that the area of $$\triangle $$'s between same pair of parallel lines and lie on the same base are equal in area

As YZ=ZR

$$\triangle$$YZX is equal to the area of $$\triangle$$ XZR

I updated the diagram
Untitledtri.png


Can You help me to determine the area of $$\triangle$$PQR in terms of $$\triangle$$XYZ

Many Thanks :)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Use the standard formula for the area: $S_{\triangle PQR}=\frac12PH\cdot QR$ where $H$ lies on $QR$ and $PH$ is the altitude from $P$. Also note that the altitude of $\triangle PQR$ is twice that of $\triangle XYZ$.
 
:)

I marked the altitudes and updated the diagram

2whqvjs.png


Evgeny.Makarov said:
Use the standard formula for the area: $S_{\triangle PQR}=\frac12PH\cdot QR$ where $H$ lies on $QR$ and $PH$ is the altitude from $P$.

The area of $$\triangle$$ PQR can be stated as :

$S_{\triangle PQR}=\frac12PH\cdot QR$

And The area of $$\triangle$$ XYZ

$S_{\triangle XYZ}=\frac12XH\cdot YZ$
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Also note that the altitude of $\triangle PQR$ is twice that of $\triangle XYZ$.

$S_{\triangle PQR}=\frac122XH\cdot QR$

$$\therefore$$$S_{\triangle PQR}=XH\cdot QR$

Many Thanks :)
 
mathlearn said:
The area of $$\triangle$$ PQR can be stated as :

$S_{\triangle PQR}=\frac12PH\cdot QR$

And The area of $$\triangle$$ XYZ

$S_{\triangle XYZ}=\frac12XH\cdot YZ$
The altitude from $X$ has a different base point on $QR$, i.e., not $H$.

mathlearn said:
$$\therefore$$$S_{\triangle PQR}=XH\cdot QR$
This is correct, but you need to find $\dfrac{S_{\triangle PQR}}{S_{\triangle XYZ}}$.
 
:)

oaykg2.png


QY=YZ=ZR $\left(given\right)$

$\therefore$ the triangles marked in red have the same area
(areas of triangles between same pair of parallel lines and equal base)

By Taking the area of one such triangle as "a",

And we see that the triangle PQR is divided into two . Therefore the area marked in orange strips should be equal to '3a'.

PX=XR (Converse of midpoint theorem)

$\therefore$ Total area= 6a or 6*XYZ

Correct I Guess ?

Many Thanks :)
 
Last edited:
mathlearn said:
And we see that the triangle PQR is divided into two .
Not just that, but into two triangles with equal area since $PX=XR$.

I agree with the rest; it's a nice solution.

I would have solved it as follows. The altitude of $\triangle PQR$ is twice the altitude of $\triangle XYZ$, and the base is three times. Therefore, the ratio of the areas is $2\cdot 3=6$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top