Determine Kinetic Energy of Satellite

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the kinetic energy of a satellite in a circular orbit, given its weight, altitude, and orbital speed. The context includes gravitational acceleration at the specified altitude and requires the application of kinetic energy equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of the satellite's weight and its relevance to the kinetic energy calculation. There are attempts to clarify whether the given weight is at the altitude or on the Earth's surface. Some participants explore the implications of using different unit systems.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the assumptions made regarding the weight of the satellite and its effect on the kinetic energy calculation. There is acknowledgment of confusion due to the problem's wording, and some guidance has been offered regarding unit conversions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem provides additional data, such as altitude and gravitational acceleration, which may not be necessary for the calculation of kinetic energy. There is also a mention of the potential confusion arising from the units used for weight.

JJBladester
Gold Member
Messages
281
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



An 870-lb satellite is placed in a circular orbit 3973 mi above the surface of the earth. At this elevation the acceleration of gravity is 8.03 ft/s2. Determine the kinetic energy of the satellite, knowing that its orbital speed is 12,500 mi/h.

Homework Equations



KE=(1/2)mv2

The Attempt at a Solution



W=870-lb
g=8.03ft/s2
h=(3973mi)*(5280ft/1mi)=2.10e7ft
v=(12,500mi/hr)*(5280ft/1mi)*(1hr/3600s)=1.83e4ft/s

KE=(1/2)mv2=(1/2)(W/g)(v2)
KE=(1/2)*(870/8.03)*(1.83e4)2=1.8e10ft-lb

The book's answer is 4.54e9ft-lb.

Where did I go wrong in calculating the satellite's KE?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think 870 lb is the mass of the satellite, and not its weight at an altitude of 3973 miles.
 
willem2 said:
I think 870 lb is the mass of the satellite, and not its weight at an altitude of 3973 miles.

If so, then the equation for KE would be:

KE=(1/2)mv2
KE=(1/2)*(870)*(1.83e4)2=1.46e11ft-lb

I'm pretty sure 870lb is the weight, because even if it were the mass, the above solution still doesn't match the correct answer.

I can't help but think that they gave the altitude for some reason... Could that play into the answer?
 
m = W/g isn't valid when W has pound-force as units.
The force that accelerates 1 pound with 1 ft/sec^2 is called a poundal and about (1/32) pound-force.
I'd convert the whole thing in SI units.
 
Right, so the answer is:

KE=(1/2)mv2=1/2(W/g)v2=(1/2)(870/32.2)(18333)2=4.54x109ft·lb.

The problem statement is confusing because it doesn't state the weight 870lb as being the weight on the Earth's surface or the weight at the altitude.

So the problem was giving a bunch of superfluous data (altitude, ag at that altitude). Perfecto... Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K