MHB Determine the matrices that represent the following rotations of R^3

kalish1
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I need to determine the matrix that represents the following rotation of $R^3$.

(a) angle $\theta$, the axis $e_2$

(b) angle $2\pi/3$, axis contains the vector $(1,1,1)^t$

(c) angle $\pi/2$, axis contains the vector $(1,1,0)^t$

Now, I would like to check if I got the right answers because this problem has been quite difficult for me. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Please forgive me for skipping the work because formatting matrices is a real pain. Especially when I have a lot of them.

For part $(a)$, I got that $(e_2,e_3,e_1)$ is an orthonormal basis of $R^3$. Then after simplification, the matrix is

$$
\begin{matrix}
\cos(\theta) & 0 & \sin(\theta) \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
-\sin(\theta) & 0 & \cos(\theta) \\
\end{matrix}
$$

For part $(b)$, I got an orthonormal basis as $\{[1/\sqrt(3), 1/\sqrt(3), 1/\sqrt(3)]^t, [1/\sqrt(2),-1/\sqrt(2),0]^t,[1/\sqrt(6),1/\sqrt(6),-2/\sqrt(6)]^t\}$.

Then after simplification, the matrix is $$
\begin{matrix}
-\sqrt(3)/2 & 0 & -1/2 \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
1/2 & 0 & -\sqrt(3)/2 \\
\end{matrix}
$$

Is what I have done so far correct such that I can proceed with part $(c)$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Part a is correct. I always point people to this web site for rotations about arbitrary axes. In your case, since your axis for part b and your axis for part c go through the origin, you won't need Steps 1 or 7, and you can also lop off the fourth column and fourth row of the remaining necessary matrices.
 
kalish said:
I need to determine the matrix that represents the following rotation of $R^3$.

(a) angle $\theta$, the axis $e_2$

For part $(a)$, I got that $(e_2,e_3,e_1)$ is an orthonormal basis of $R^3$. Then after simplification, the matrix is

$$
\begin{bmatrix}
\cos(\theta) & 0 & \sin(\theta) \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
-\sin(\theta) & 0 & \cos(\theta) \\
\end{bmatrix}
$$

Correct. :)
(b) angle $2\pi/3$, axis contains the vector $(1,1,1)^t$

For part $(b)$, I got an orthonormal basis as $\{[1/\sqrt(3), 1/\sqrt(3), 1/\sqrt(3)]^t, [1/\sqrt(2),-1/\sqrt(2),0]^t,[1/\sqrt(6),1/\sqrt(6),-2/\sqrt(6)]^t\}$.

Then after simplification, the matrix is $$
\begin{bmatrix}
-\sqrt(3)/2 & 0 & -1/2 \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
1/2 & 0 & -\sqrt(3)/2 \\
\end{bmatrix}
$$

Is what I have done so far correct such that I can proceed with part $(c)$?

Your orthonormal basis is correct.

But let's see...
The axis is invariant.
What do you get if you multiply your matrix by the axis (1,1,1)?
Is it (1,1,1)?

Furthermore, (1,-1,0) is perpendicular to the axis.
So if I multiply the matrix with it, I should get a vector that makes an angle of $2\pi/3$.
Put otherwise, the dot product should be $\sqrt 2 \cdot \sqrt 2 \cdot \cos(2\pi/3) = -1$.
Is it?
Moreover, that vector should also be perpendicular to the axis (1,1,1). Is it?
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
3K