MHB Determine the matrices that represent the following rotations of R^3

kalish1
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I need to determine the matrix that represents the following rotation of $R^3$.

(a) angle $\theta$, the axis $e_2$

(b) angle $2\pi/3$, axis contains the vector $(1,1,1)^t$

(c) angle $\pi/2$, axis contains the vector $(1,1,0)^t$

Now, I would like to check if I got the right answers because this problem has been quite difficult for me. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Please forgive me for skipping the work because formatting matrices is a real pain. Especially when I have a lot of them.

For part $(a)$, I got that $(e_2,e_3,e_1)$ is an orthonormal basis of $R^3$. Then after simplification, the matrix is

$$
\begin{matrix}
\cos(\theta) & 0 & \sin(\theta) \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
-\sin(\theta) & 0 & \cos(\theta) \\
\end{matrix}
$$

For part $(b)$, I got an orthonormal basis as $\{[1/\sqrt(3), 1/\sqrt(3), 1/\sqrt(3)]^t, [1/\sqrt(2),-1/\sqrt(2),0]^t,[1/\sqrt(6),1/\sqrt(6),-2/\sqrt(6)]^t\}$.

Then after simplification, the matrix is $$
\begin{matrix}
-\sqrt(3)/2 & 0 & -1/2 \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
1/2 & 0 & -\sqrt(3)/2 \\
\end{matrix}
$$

Is what I have done so far correct such that I can proceed with part $(c)$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Part a is correct. I always point people to this web site for rotations about arbitrary axes. In your case, since your axis for part b and your axis for part c go through the origin, you won't need Steps 1 or 7, and you can also lop off the fourth column and fourth row of the remaining necessary matrices.
 
kalish said:
I need to determine the matrix that represents the following rotation of $R^3$.

(a) angle $\theta$, the axis $e_2$

For part $(a)$, I got that $(e_2,e_3,e_1)$ is an orthonormal basis of $R^3$. Then after simplification, the matrix is

$$
\begin{bmatrix}
\cos(\theta) & 0 & \sin(\theta) \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
-\sin(\theta) & 0 & \cos(\theta) \\
\end{bmatrix}
$$

Correct. :)
(b) angle $2\pi/3$, axis contains the vector $(1,1,1)^t$

For part $(b)$, I got an orthonormal basis as $\{[1/\sqrt(3), 1/\sqrt(3), 1/\sqrt(3)]^t, [1/\sqrt(2),-1/\sqrt(2),0]^t,[1/\sqrt(6),1/\sqrt(6),-2/\sqrt(6)]^t\}$.

Then after simplification, the matrix is $$
\begin{bmatrix}
-\sqrt(3)/2 & 0 & -1/2 \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
1/2 & 0 & -\sqrt(3)/2 \\
\end{bmatrix}
$$

Is what I have done so far correct such that I can proceed with part $(c)$?

Your orthonormal basis is correct.

But let's see...
The axis is invariant.
What do you get if you multiply your matrix by the axis (1,1,1)?
Is it (1,1,1)?

Furthermore, (1,-1,0) is perpendicular to the axis.
So if I multiply the matrix with it, I should get a vector that makes an angle of $2\pi/3$.
Put otherwise, the dot product should be $\sqrt 2 \cdot \sqrt 2 \cdot \cos(2\pi/3) = -1$.
Is it?
Moreover, that vector should also be perpendicular to the axis (1,1,1). Is it?
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top