Determine the speed of the block at the bottom of the inclin

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the speed of a block at the bottom of a slippery inclined plane, given its acceleration as gsin(θ). The context includes gravitational potential energy and its relationship to kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the expression for gravitational potential energy and its variables, questioning how to relate potential energy to velocity. There are inquiries about the definitions of variables and the relationship between kinetic and potential energy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the equations involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between potential and kinetic energy, and the relevance of kinematic equations is noted. There is no explicit consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of the given acceleration and the definitions of potential and kinetic energy. There is uncertainty regarding the variables used in the equations and how they relate to the problem's requirements.

emily081715
Messages
208
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


You release a block from the top of a long, slippery inclined plane of length l that makes an angle θwith the horizontal. The magnitude of the block's acceleration is gsin(θ) .Use the expression you derived in the previous part to determine the speed of the block at the bottom of the incline.
Express your answer in terms of g and the variables m, l, and θ.

Homework Equations


UG=−mgsinθ(x−l)

The Attempt at a Solution


i know that the correct answer does not depend on "m" so i assumed the equation would be v=l/gsinθ. that's inccorrect and i tried reversing it too and still wrong. i know that they won't be multiplied so I'm unsure the relation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What was the "expression you derived in the previous part"? Something to do with velocity, acceleration, and distance perhaps?
 
gneill said:
What was the "expression you derived in the previous part"? Something to do with velocity, acceleration, and distance perhaps?
this was it : UG=−mgsinθ(x−l)
 
Okay, well that appears to be an expression for gravitational potential energy. What are x and l in that equation?

You still need to get to velocity somehow. Have you learned about conservation of energy and how kinetic energy and potential energy are related?
 
gneill said:
Okay, well that appears to be an expression for gravitational potential energy. What are x and l in that equation?

You still need to get to velocity somehow. Have you learned about conservation of energy and how kinetic energy and potential energy are related?
l= inclined plane lenght
x=UG(x=l)=0.
k=-U
 
emily081715 said:
l= inclined plane lenght
x=UG(x=l)=0.
k=-U
I have to ask, is UG something different from U, and is k meant to represent kinetic energy?

Do you know how to find the velocity if you have the kinetic energy?

On a related subject, the problem statement tells you that the magnitude of the acceleration is given by gsin(θ). Do you know a standard kinematic equation that relates acceleration, distance, and velocity?
 
gneill said:
I have to ask, is UG something different from U, and is k meant to represent kinetic energy?

Do you know how to find the velocity if you have the kinetic energy?

On a related subject, the problem statement tells you that the magnitude of the acceleration is given by gsin(θ). Do you know a standard kinematic equation that relates acceleration, distance, and velocity?
Ug is potential energy, k is kinetic energy
 
emily081715 said:
Ug is potential energy, k is kinetic energy
yes is i have kinetic energy, velcoity is the square root of k/m
 
but i don't have kinetic energy, i have potential
 
  • #10
would speed be the √mgsinθ(x−l)/0.5m
 
  • #11
emily081715 said:
yes is i have kinetic energy, velcoity is the square root of k/m
Not quite. Since ##k = \frac{1}{2} m v^2##, then solving for v gives ##v = \sqrt{\frac{2 k}{m}}##. Don't forget that "2".

emily081715 said:
but i don't have kinetic energy, i have potential
But you know how they are related. Once the block moves from the top of the ramp to the bottom, what happens to the potential energy? Where does the energy go?

emily081715 said:
would speed be the √mgsinθ(x−l)/0.5m
It's hard to tell because I can't be sure what the square root sign is meant to cover. And I'm still not sure what x is meant to be. I understand that l is the inclined plane length from post #5:
emily081715 said:
l= inclined plane lenght
x=UG(x=l)=0.
k=-U
But I'm not sure how to read your second equation. Surely you're not equating a length to a potential energy?
 
  • #12
The square root sign is meant to cover everything
 
  • #13
emily081715 said:
The square root sign is meant to cover everything
In that case I believe that it will yield the velocity. Note that the mass m cancels in the numerator and denominator. It would probably be more clear if you were to replace (x - l) with a single variable like "d" for the distance traveled along the slope.

Note that there's also a kinematic equation that you should be familiar with that would get you to the result quickly if you know the acceleration and distance (which you do in this case).
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K