MHB Determine the vectors of components

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

For the polynomial vector space $\mathbb{R}[x]$ of degree $\leq 3$ we have the following three bases:
$$B_1 = \{1 - X^2 + X^3, X - X^2, 1 - X + X^2, 1 - X\} , \\
B_2 = \{1 - X^3, 1 - X^2, 1 - X, 1 + X^2 - X^3\}, \\
B_3 = \{1, X, X^2, X^3\}$$

How can we determine the following vectors of components $\mathbb{R}^4$ ?

$\Theta_{B_1}(b)$ for all $b \in B_1$

and

$\Theta_{B_3}(b)$ for all $b \in B_1$

Could you give me hint? (Wondering)

Do we use the transformation matrix? If yes, how? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have seen the following notes :

$\Theta_{B_1}(b\in B_1)=i$-th comlumn of idenity, since it shown always at itself, and $\Theta_{B_3}(b\in B_1)=i$-th column of $B_1$. Why does this hold? (Wondering)
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top