Determine whether the function is a linear transformation (Attempt inside)

Click For Summary
The function T: Mnn => R defined by T(A) = tr(A) is shown to be a linear transformation through two main properties: T(kA) = k T(A) and T(A+B) = T(A) + T(B). While the argument presented is technically correct, it lacks sufficient detail and does not explicitly reference the definition of the trace. For academic grading, more comprehensive justification would be expected to demonstrate understanding. Overall, the conclusion that T is a linear transformation is valid, but the explanation requires improvement for clarity and completeness.
sam0617
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
T: Mnn => R, where T(A) = tr(A)

Attempt:

1) T(kA) = tr(kA) = k tr(A) = k T(A)



2) T(A+B) = tr (A + B) = tr(A) + tr(B) = T(A) + T(B)

so it's linear transformation. Am I correct?
 
  • Like
Likes TMSS
Physics news on Phys.org
technically, yes, but if that was homework, and i were grading it, i don't think i'd give it full marks.

you should show a little more work, you haven't used the definition of trace anywhere...
 
  • Like
Likes TMSS
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K