Determining a Basis for P2: Alpha Values

  • Thread starter Thread starter snoggerT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis
Click For Summary
To determine the values of the constant alpha for which the set {1 + alpha*x^2, 1 + x + x^2, 2 + x} forms a basis for P2, it is essential to establish the linear independence of these vectors. The dimension of P2 is 3, so the three vectors must be linearly independent to form a basis. By setting up a system of equations based on the coefficients of the polynomials, it is found that the vectors are linearly dependent when alpha = -1, indicating that this value must be excluded. The discussion emphasizes that proving linear independence is often simpler than proving that the vectors span the space. Ultimately, the values of alpha that allow the set to be a basis for P2 are all real numbers except for -1.
snoggerT
Messages
183
Reaction score
0
Determine all values of the constant (alpha) for which
{1+(alpha)*x^2, 1+x+x^2, 2 +x} is a basis for P2


The Attempt at a Solution



once again I'm not real sure how to solve this problem. Would I set it up as a system of linear equations? How do you start a problem like this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well the basis is the smallest set of vectors that spans a space. It might be easiest to determine all values of alpha such that those 3 vectors are not linearly independent. Consider, for example, alpha = -1.
 
Can you explain how linear independence works on a vector like that? I know that -1 is the answer, but why wouldn't say -2 or any other negative number?
 
So you have 3 potential basis vectors: v_1 = 1+\alpha x^2, v_2 = 1+x+x^2 and v_3 = 2+x

Since there are 3 vectors and you won't find a basis of P2 that has less than 3 members, it suffices to find where v_1 ,v_2 ,v_3 are linearly independent. This means that we want to find where v_1 \neq c_1 v_2 + c_2 v_3, where c_1 and c_2 are constants. This means we can formulate 3 equations corresponding to the coefficients on the powers of x for v_1 to find where they *are* linearly dependent and not include the corresponding value(s) of \alpha in the solution:

1 = c_1 + 2c_2
0 = c_1 + c_2
\alpha = c_1

Solving for c_1 and c_2 we find that c_1 = -1 and c_2 = 1 corresponding to an \alpha = -1.

Edit: \LaTeX is showing up a bit weird so maybe check back in a few.
 
Last edited:
snoggerT said:
Determine all values of the constant (alpha) for which
{1+(alpha)*x^2, 1+x+x^2, 2 +x} is a basis for P2





The Attempt at a Solution



once again I'm not real sure how to solve this problem. Would I set it up as a system of linear equations? How do you start a problem like this?

You know, I guess, that P2, the space of all quadratic polynomials, has dimension 3. Knowing that you can show a set of 3 vectors has is a basis by showing either:
1) it spans the space or
2) its vectors are independent.

1) For what values of \alpha do 1+ \alpha x^2, 1+ x+ x^2, and 2+ x span all of P2?
Any "vector" in P2 can be written as a^2+ bx+ c. We need to find p, q, r so that p(1+ \alpha x^2)+ q(1+ x+ x^2)+ r(2+ x)= ax^2+ bx+ c. Multiplying out the right side and collecting coefficients of like powers, (p\alpha+ q)x^2+ (q+ r)x+ (p+ q+ 2r)= ax^2+ bc+ c. For that to be true for all x, corresp[onding coefficients must be the same: p\alpha+ q= a, q+ r= b, p+ q+ r= c. For what values of \alpha does that systme have a solution? (It might be simpler to ask, "for what values of \alpha does that not have a solution.

2) For what values of \alpha are 1+ \alpha x^2, 1+ x+ x^2, and 2+ x independent?

They will be independent if the only way we can have p(1+ \alpha x^2)+ q(1+ x+ x^2)+ r(2+ x)= 0 is to have p= q= r= 0. Again, multiplying out the left side and collecting coefficients of like powers, that is (p\alpha+ q)x^2+ (q+ r)x+ (p+ q+ 2r)= 0. For that to be true for all x, all coefficients must be 0: p\alpha+ q= 0, q+ r= 0, p+ q+ r= 0. For what values of \alpha is the only solution to that system of equations r= p= q= 0?

Notice that in (2) you have the same system of equations as in 1 except they are equal to 0 instead of the arbitrary numbers a, b, c. Typically, it is easier to prove "independence" rather than "spanning".

And, by the way, this problem has a very simple answer!
 
HallsofIvy said:
You know, I guess, that P2, the space of all quadratic polynomials, has dimension 3. Knowing that you can show a set of 3 vectors has is a basis by showing either:
1) it spans the space or
2) its vectors are independent.

1) For what values of \alpha do 1+ \alpha x^2, 1+ x+ x^2, and 2+ x span all of P2?
Any "vector" in P2 can be written as a^2+ bx+ c. We need to find p, q, r so that p(1+ \alpha x^2)+ q(1+ x+ x^2)+ r(2+ x)= ax^2+ bx+ c. Multiplying out the right side and collecting coefficients of like powers, (p\alpha+ q)x^2+ (q+ r)x+ (p+ q+ 2r)= ax^2+ bc+ c. For that to be true for all x, corresp[onding coefficients must be the same: p\alpha+ q= a, q+ r= b, p+ q+ r= c. For what values of \alpha does that systme have a solution? (It might be simpler to ask, "for what values of \alpha does that not have a solution.

2) For what values of \alpha are 1+ \alpha x^2, 1+ x+ x^2, and 2+ x independent?

They will be independent if the only way we can have p(1+ \alpha x^2)+ q(1+ x+ x^2)+ r(2+ x)= 0 is to have p= q= r= 0. Again, multiplying out the left side and collecting coefficients of like powers, that is (p\alpha+ q)x^2+ (q+ r)x+ (p+ q+ 2r)= 0. For that to be true for all x, all coefficients must be 0: p\alpha+ q= 0, q+ r= 0, p+ q+ r= 0. For what values of \alpha is the only solution to that system of equations r= p= q= 0?

Notice that in (2) you have the same system of equations as in 1 except they are equal to 0 instead of the arbitrary numbers a, b, c. Typically, it is easier to prove "independence" rather than "spanning".

And, by the way, this problem has a very simple answer!

- What happened to the 2 in the (p+q+2r) portion of the equation when you set it to 0?

Also, would you solve using a matrix of coefficients? If so, how would you use alpha in it? I understand how you set it up, but not how to solve it.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K