Determining Finiteness of (ZxZ)/H for a,b,c,d

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter e12514
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The factor group (ZxZ)/H is finite if and only if the determinant ad - bc is non-zero, where H is the subgroup generated by the vectors (a,b) and (c,d). If ad is equal to bc, the factor group is infinite. The discussion emphasizes the need for rigorous algebraic proof rather than relying solely on geometric interpretations. A proper proof should detail the relationship between the subgroup H and the area represented by the determinant of the matrix formed by (a,b) and (c,d).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically factor groups
  • Familiarity with determinants in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of vector spaces and subgroups
  • Ability to construct algebraic proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants in relation to subgroup generation
  • Learn about algebraic proofs in group theory
  • Explore the relationship between geometric interpretations and algebraic structures
  • Investigate examples of finite and infinite factor groups in ZxZ
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in group theory and linear algebra applications.

e12514
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Quick question:


Fix integers a,b,c,d.
Let H be the subgroup of ZxZ generated by (a,b) and (c,d).
When (in terms of a,b,c,d) is the factor group (ZxZ)/H finite?



I figured that if ad is not equal to bc then the factor group (ZxZ)/H is of order ad-bc, and if ad is equal to bc then the factor group (ZxZ)/H is infinite. But I can only figure out how to prove it by drawing diagrams and showing it geometrically. Are there any rigorous ways to prove that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is non-rigorous about what you did, and how can you go about correcting that?
 
Non-rigorous: drawing diagrams and describing what's happening instead of precise lines of algebraic proof.

Rigorous: perhaps some proof not via a geometric point of view, and purely by considering the group ZxZ and the subgroup H and the factor groups algebraicly? (If that's possible)
 
Firstly, it is not necessarily true that your first argument is not rigorous. Write out you 'non-rigorous' descriptions, and see if you can make them satisfy your notion of rigorous. If a proof is logically correct without any leaps of faith then it doesn't matter whether it is diagrammatic or not.

Anyway, the point is that your subgroup H is the set of all points (ax+cy, bx+dy), isn't it? Sums of multiples of (a,b) and (c,d). Now doesn't that look a lot like what happens when you apply a matrix to (x,y)? A matrix involving a,b,c,d, and isn't ad-bc very suggestive when you think about matrices?
 
Well yes. What I have is that the set of points in H are elements of the form (ma+nc, mb+nd) which is pictured geometrically by the set of points on ZxZ that lies on any multiple of the vector (a,b) or (c,d) or a combination of both. The number of elements in (ZxZ)/H is then the number of points contained inside inside one //gram plus the point on the bottom left vertex, which should be equal to its area, which is equal to the determinant of the matrix whose first column is a,b and second column is c,d , equalling (the absolute value of) ad-bc. With a diagram showing the elements of H and joining them up with parallel lines etc.

The only problem is I think that was just a description rather than a proper proof, and I probably need to go into more detail for proving certain parts, perhaps that the number of elements in H is equal to the area which is equal to the determinant... etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
12K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K