Determining Forces on Pipes and Rollers - Get Help Here!

  • Thread starter Thread starter TSN79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Pipes
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
10 replies · 3K views
TSN79
Messages
422
Reaction score
0
The drawing below shows two pipes lying on top of each other. Forces act on the different contact points, and I am to determine these as a result of the pipes' weight G. I'm able to do this graphically, but not by calculation.

Next up is a similar problem, I'm to determine the forces at A and B, where B is a roller. Here I'm able to do it analytically, but not graphically.

If someone could help me I'd really appreciate it :smile:
 

Attachments

  • pipes.jpg
    pipes.jpg
    10.8 KB · Views: 518
  • beam.jpg
    beam.jpg
    5.5 KB · Views: 498
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not quite sure what you mean by the second problem so I will try and point you in the right direction on the first: Consider each pipe as a free body and recall that you can sum up forces whose lines of action pass through a common point which, because I am assuming no friction (because you didn't mention any) and the fact that all surfaces are tangential, is the center of each pipe.
 

Looks like a simple torque questio to me. What do you mean by a 'roller' at B? Which way can it rotate?

~H
 
A roller is a type of connection. Just terminology. It only has a normal force.
 
cyrusabdollahi said:
A roller is a type of connection. Just terminology. It only has a normal force.

Ahh, thank you cyrus. I apologise for my ignorace; I've never heard of the term before, it is a term specific to engineering?

To TSN
In light of cyrus' information, this question is definatly a simple torque question.

~H
 
I know it's a question of torque, but I can't figure out how to solve it graphically. In a graphical solution all the forces need to make an enclosed polygon, which you can use to measure the length (and therefore their magnetude). But here I can't seem to make that work.
 
TSN79 said:
In a graphical solution all the forces need to make an enclosed polygon, which you can use to measure the length (and therefore their magnetude). But here I can't seem to make that work.

This method does not work with torques I'm afraid. Is it a requirment that you solve it graphically?

~H
 
Well, the book says to find the reactions by A and B graphically...there is no way?
 
TSN79 said:
Well, the book says to find the reactions by A and B graphically...there is no way?

I Suppose one could measure the distances and length of F to find the torqures involved but this still would required some calculation, would this be considered graphically by your book?

~H
 
For the second problem, you will need to know or then assume a distance from A where the force is located before you can solve the problem.
 
civil_dude said:
For the second problem, you will need to know or then assume a distance from A where the force is located before you can solve the problem.

Thats what I meant when I said measure. That is ofcourse assuming that the diagram is drawn to scale.

~H