Determining groups not sure how to prove it.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lostNfound
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the set G={a+b*sqrt(2) | a,b ∈ R; a,b not both 0} forms a group under ordinary multiplication. Participants explore the necessary group axioms, including closure, identity, and inverses, within the context of abstract algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in proving that G is a group and seeks assistance.
  • Another participant suggests verifying the group axioms, particularly questioning the closure and identity properties.
  • Some participants discuss the assumption of associativity, noting that it can be derived from the properties of real numbers.
  • Closure is proposed to be shown by multiplying two arbitrary elements of G and demonstrating that the result remains in G.
  • Inverses are described as more challenging, with a common method mentioned for expressing the inverse in the required form.
  • A later reply emphasizes the importance of explicitly performing the multiplication to show closure and rationalizing the denominator for the inverse.
  • One participant later indicates they resolved the problem independently and thanks others for their help.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the steps needed to prove G is a group, but there is no consensus on the specifics of the proofs for closure and inverses, as some details remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to verify closure and inverses without providing complete proofs, indicating potential gaps in the discussion.

lostNfound
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm going through a abstract algebra book I found and am trying to learn more about group theory by going through some of the proofs and practice sets, but am having trouble with the following:

Prove that G={a+b*sqrt(2) | a,b E R; a,b not both 0} is a group under ordinary multiplication.

Any help would be awesome!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lostNfound said:
I'm going through a abstract algebra book I found and am trying to learn more about group theory by going through some of the proofs and practice sets, but am having trouble with the following:

Prove that G={a+b*sqrt(2) | a,b E R; a,b not both 0} is a group under ordinary multiplication.

Any help would be awesome!

Where are you stuck? You know that you need to verify each of the group axioms. Is your set closed under the given binary operation? Is there an identity? etc.
 
lostNfound said:
So I know that in order to prove it is a group, there are several things that have to be confirmed, including associativity, closure, inverses, and identity. Associativity seems like it can be assumed, but the others till have to be proved. I'm having most of my trouble with the closure and inverse proofs, especially that for closure.

Closure is easy, you just take two arbirtrary elements a+b sqrt(2) and c + d sqrt(2), compute the product and show that it also is a member of G.

Inverses are a little harder, altough a very common trick that you should definitely know can be used to get

[tex]\frac { 1 } { a + b \sqrt(2) }[/tex] in the form: c + d sqrt(2)
 
So I know that in order to prove it is a group, there are several things that have to be confirmed, including associativity, closure, inverses, and identity. Associativity seems like it can be assumed, but the others till have to be proved. I'm having most of my trouble with the closure and inverse proofs, especially that for closure.
Why did you delete this? I wouldn't say you should assume associativity but certainly you can just note that multiplication of real numbers is associative and this is just a subset of the real numbers. To show closure write the product of two such numbers as [itex](a+ b\sqrt{2})(c+ d\sqrt{2})[/itex] and actually do the multiplication. What do you get? Show that it can be written as [itex]u+ v\sqrt{2}[/itex] by showing what u and v must be. The identity is [itex]1= 1+ 0\sqrt{2}[/itex], of course.

And the multiplicative inverse of [itex]a+ b\sqrt{2}[/itex] is [itex]1/(a+ b\sqrt{2})[/itex]. Rationalize the denominator to show how that can be written in the form [itex]u+ v\sqrt{2}[/itex].
 
Sorry I deleted that. I was trying to delete the post so people didn't feel like they needed to keep answering it. I was able to work out the answer on my own earlier. Thanks for the help though. I think we are on the same page.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K