Determining Mass of Holder w/ Period Squared Graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter erik-the-red
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Mass Period
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the mass of a holder using a "Period Squared vs. Mass Added" graph in a physics lab context. The relationship is established through the equation T² = (4π²/k)(m_added + m_holder), which is linear in form, allowing the mass of the holder to be derived from the y-intercept. Users encountered discrepancies between calculated and measured periods, leading to confusion regarding the interpretation of negative values in the graph. The use of Curve Expert software for coefficient analysis and standard deviation calculations is emphasized as a method to refine results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion principles
  • Familiarity with the equation T² = (4π²/k)(m_added + m_holder)
  • Experience with graphing linear equations
  • Knowledge of using Curve Expert for data analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and implications of the equation T² = (4π²/k)(m_added + m_holder)
  • Learn how to interpret y-intercepts and x-intercepts in linear graphs
  • Explore advanced features of Curve Expert for statistical analysis
  • Investigate common sources of error in mass measurements in physics experiments
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, lab instructors, and anyone involved in experimental mechanics or data analysis in physics labs.

erik-the-red
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
Determining the mass of a holder through a "Period Squared vs. Mass Added" graph?

This question is for Physics Lab.

The second part of the lab dealt with simple harmonic motion. We weighed a mass holder with spring attached using a pan balance. We then added .2 kg and increased the weight to this spring and used a smart timer to time the period.

Apparently, I'm supposed to be able to confirm the mass of the holder and spring by using the graph of "Period Squared vs. Mass Added."

Why would the y-intercept give the mass of the holder? That doesn't make sense to me.

I'm supposed to perform a sample calculation using the equation T^2 = (4\pi^2/k)(m_{added} + m_{holder}). However, if I calculate the period using the equation T = 2\pi\sqrt(M/k), the answer is not at all similar to what I measured. If I use the value of period squared based on the experiment, then I get a negative answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
erik-the-red said:
Why would the y-intercept give the mass of the holder? That doesn't make sense to me.

Hint: T^2 = (4\pi^2/k)(m_{added} + m_{holder}) is a linear equation of the form y = mx + b. Multiply it out.
 
Thanks. The equation fits in with the graph in terms of axes.
 
Then, what does the negative value of x-intercept means?
 
Hummm... It means the x intercept is negative!

Perhaps you could provide a bit more information.

Does your question have anything to do with the thread you posted in?
 


How could one get the error in mass here?

I have my T^{2} formula matched up to y=ax+b.
A program Curve Expert will give me values for the coefficients a and b.
I am finding the standard deviation using Curve Expert and thus will get the error in spring constant k. (as a=4pi^2/k) This should carry through when calculating the mass of the spring in b?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
850
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K