Determining Normal Subgroups in S(3) - A Mathematical Puzzle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining which subgroups of the symmetric group S(3) are normal. Participants explore the conditions for normality, the enumeration of subgroups, and the implications of normal subgroups in the context of group theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states they have identified 13 subgroups of S(3) and seeks a more efficient method to determine normality than examining each subgroup individually.
  • Another participant lists the known subgroups of S(3) based on its order and challenges the claim of 13 subgroups, identifying only four proper subgroups of orders 2 and 3.
  • There is a discussion about the notation used for the elements of S(3), with one participant questioning the transformation of elements from one notation to another.
  • One participant explains the concept of normal subgroups and the definition of G/H, emphasizing the relationship between left and right cosets.
  • A later reply questions whether G/H being a subgroup of G implies that it is Abelian, to which another participant responds negatively.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the meaning of "G modulo H" and seek clarification on this concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is disagreement regarding the number of subgroups of S(3) and their normality. Some participants challenge each other's interpretations and notations, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on different definitions and notations for the elements of S(3), which may lead to confusion. There are also unresolved questions regarding the implications of normal subgroups and the structure of G/H.

Marin
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I want to determine which of the subgropus of the symmetric group S(3) are normal. The condition is:

for every g in G: g H g^-1 = H where H is a subgroup of G.


I have determined all the subgroups of S(3) and I came up with 13.


What I did after that is I considered 2 cases:

1: g is elem. of H, then g^-1 is also in H and the condition is satisfied.
2: g is not el. of H, but still el. of G, the same is true for g^-1.

then I got stuck :(

theoretically all the subgroups could be examined one by one, but it seems to me somehow too long and "not mathematical"

Does anyone know a better way?

thanks in advance!

° and another question: If H is a normal subgroup of G, what should one understand under "G modulo H"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, as you know:

[tex]S_3=\{(1),(12),(13),(23),(123),(132)\}[/tex] Now since [tex]o(S_3)=6[/tex] it follows that its subgroups can be only of order 1, 2, 3 or 6. OF course the only subgroups of ord. 1 and 6 are the trivial one and S_3 itself respectively.

So we are left with proper subgroups of ord 2 and 3. which are

[tex]H_1=\{(1),(12)\}, H_2=\{(1),(13)\},H_3=\{(1),(23)\},H_4=\{(1),(123),(132)\}[/tex]

So where did you get 13 subgroups?

Then what i would do here, since the order of S_3 is not large, just look at the table for the operaton of S_3, and determine for which subgroups H_i, i=1,2,3,4=> gH=Hg. for every g in G.

H_1, is not normal since, [tex](123)^{-1}(12)(123)=(132)(12)(123)=(1)(23)=(23)[/tex] thus (23) is not in H_1.
 
hmmm in my book the 6 elements are denoted:

(123), (132), (213), (231), (312), (321) - how did you transform them in (1), (12), (13), (23), (123), (132)
 
Marin said:
hmmm in my book the 6 elements are denoted:

(123), (132), (213), (231), (312), (321) - how did you transform them in (1), (12), (13), (23), (123), (132)


well what does (123) mean??

It simply means the following, let f be the mapping then: f: 1-->2; 2-->3, 3-->1

so following this logic, it yields that

(123)=(231) =(312)and also (132)=(321)=(213) and these are actually only your even permutations in S_3, including (1) of course since (1)=(12)(21)

Well, either you are misinterpreting what it is written in the book, or it is a typo, because the 6 elements of the symmetric group S_3 are the ones i listed.

it is simply all the mappings that go from f:X_3--->X_3 where X_3={1,2,3} such that f is bijective.
 
thanks, sutupidmath, I think I got it

could you also help me eoth this: "If H is a normal subgroup of G, what should one understand under "G modulo H" ". I just cannot figure out what it means G modulo H in this context.
 
If your textbook is defines normal subgroups it certainly should have a definition of G/H!

A subgroup, H, of a group G is normal if and only if the right cosets, Hx, are the same as the left cosets, xH. That's important because it allows us to put an operation on the cosets: If xH and yH are two different left cosets of H, then "(xH)(yH)" is the left coset (xy)H. Of course, z is another member of xH, we can also represent that "zH". Would (zH)(yH)= (zy)H give the same coset? It can be shown that it will if and only if H is a normal subgroup of G- that the left and right cosets are the same.

In that case, we define G/H to be the collection of all left cosets of H with that operation as group operation.
 
but if G/H is a subgroup of G, for that xH=Hx for every x of [x], could we say then that G/H Abelian is?
 
No, that does not follow.
 
well I think I have to take a break now :)

Thank you very much for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K