Determining order of the poles in z/(e^z-1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ratpigeon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poles
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the order of the poles for the function f(z) = z/(e^z - 1). The poles are identified at z = 2πik for k ∈ Z\{0}, with the pole at z = 0 being a removable singularity, thus having an order of zero. Participants explored using the Taylor series expansion of e^z and L'Hôpital's rule to analyze the behavior of f(z) near its poles. The conclusion is that the poles at z = 2nπi are simple poles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis and pole theory
  • Familiarity with Taylor series expansions
  • Knowledge of L'Hôpital's rule for limits
  • Basic concepts of removable singularities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of removable singularities in complex functions
  • Learn about the residue theorem and its applications in complex analysis
  • Explore advanced techniques for evaluating limits involving complex functions
  • Investigate the implications of simple poles in contour integration
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying complex analysis, and educators looking for examples of pole determination in functions.

Ratpigeon
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the order of the poles of

f(z)=z/(e^z-1)


Homework Equations



The poles are at z=2 π i k k\inZ\0
(Because at z=0 f(z) has a removable singularity -set f(0)=1)

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using the Taylor series of e^z - \sumz^n/n!
But I just got
f(z)=1/\sumz^n/(n+1)!
and I somehow need to take out a factor of (z-2 π i k)^j for some j>0 out of that...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ratpigeon said:

Homework Statement


Find the order of the poles of

f(z)=z/(e^z-1)


Homework Equations



The poles are at z=2 π i k k\inZ\0
(Because at z=0 f(z) has a removable singularity -set f(0)=1)

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using the Taylor series of e^z - \sumz^n/n!
But I just got
f(z)=1/\sumz^n/(n+1)!
and I somehow need to take out a factor of (z-2 π i k)^j for some j>0 out of that...

Given f(z), what is the minumum power of (z-z_0) would I have to multiply the function by so that:

\lim_{z\to z_0} (z-z_0)^n f(z) \neq \infty

Take for example at zero:

\lim_{z\to 0} z^0 \left(\frac{z}{e^z-1}\right)\neq \infty

thus the order of the pole at zero is zero, i.e., it's removable. Ok, now you try the pole at 2n\pi i.
 
Right - got them. I got my brain stuck on taylor series, when I needed l'hospital's rule. Thanks.
They're simple poles with limits z->z_0=z_0, right? :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K