Determining Photon Paths in a Double Slit System

  • Thread starter Thread starter kof9595995
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
Click For Summary
To determine the path of photons in a double slit system without disrupting the diffraction pattern, the condition δyδpy << h/4π must be satisfied, which conflicts with the uncertainty principle. The discussion highlights that maintaining the interference pattern requires keeping the angle small enough to prevent maximums from merging with adjacent minimums. Adjustments to the parameters suggest that δy could be less than d/8, leading to a derived inequality of δpy/δy < h/16. This indicates that achieving the desired measurement without violating quantum principles is challenging. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the complexities of photon behavior in quantum mechanics.
kof9595995
Messages
676
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Show that in order to be able to determine through which slit a double slit system each photon passes without destroying the double silt diffraction pattern, the condition
\delta y\delta {p_y} \ll \frac{h}{{4\pi }}
must be satisfied. Since this condition violated the uncertainty principle, it can not be met

Homework Equations


d\sin \theta = \lambda
\sin \theta = \frac{{\delta {p_y}}}{p}
\lambda = \frac{h}{p}

The Attempt at a Solution


In order not to destroy the pattern, the angle should not be large enough to shift one maximum to its adjacent maximum. So \sin \theta \ll \frac{\lambda }{d}, and then we have
\frac{{\delta {p_y}}}{p} \ll \frac{\lambda }{d}
To figure out which slit the photon passes through, we must have
\delta y \ll \frac{d}{2}
Combine these two and use de broglie's relation \lambda = \frac{h}{p}
We can get
\delta y\delta {p_y} \ll \frac{h}{2}

But it seems to me the extra 2\pi just comes out from nowhere. I'm really pulling my hair off on this quetsion

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I was stuck with this problem as well, and your approach provided the spark. Thanks so much :smile:.
However following up on your argument, let's look at it this way:
"In order not to destroy the pattern, the angle should not be large enough to shift one maximum to its adjacent MINIMUM". My point here is that if the bright band/s merge with the dark band/s, THAT would destroy the interference pattern . So Sin Θ < λ/2d (would this then be right, btw ?). Hence ΔPy/P < λ/2d.
Next, to figure out which slit the photon passes through, and quite arbitrarily frankly, I assume Δy < d/8 (as opposed to d/2)
Pulling all this together we then get: ΔPy/Δy < h/16, and since h/16 < h/4π.
Hence ΔPyΔy < h/4π !
Can anybody do better ?!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K