Determining the direction of the magnetic field of an infinite sheet of current

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the direction of the magnetic field generated by an infinite uniform surface current \textbf{K} = K \widehat{x} using Ampere's law and the Biot-Savart law, as outlined in Griffiths' 3rd edition textbook. It is established that the magnetic field has no component in the x-direction due to its perpendicular relationship with the current direction. Furthermore, the z-component of the magnetic field is shown to be non-existent, as reversing the current direction would lead to an inconsistency in the z-component's direction, which cannot depend on an arbitrary choice of current direction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ampere's Law
  • Familiarity with Biot-Savart Law
  • Knowledge of magnetic field concepts
  • Griffiths' Introduction to Electrodynamics (3rd edition)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of magnetic fields using Ampere's Law
  • Explore the applications of the Biot-Savart Law in various geometries
  • Investigate the implications of symmetry in magnetic field calculations
  • Review examples of infinite current sheets in electromagnetic theory
USEFUL FOR

Students of electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of magnetic fields generated by surface currents.

LostInToronto
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This is a question about determining the direction of the magnetic field so we can use Ampere's law.

I'm working out of the 3rd edition of Griffiths' textbook. Ex. 5.8 on page 226 is "Find the magnetic field of an infinite uniform surface current \textbf{K} = K \widehat{x} flowing over the xy plane."

First we want to determine the direction of B. It's clear that there is no component of the magnetic field that is in the x-direction, because the Biot-Savart law shows that the B-field is perpendicular to the direction of the current.

Griffiths says there is a nice argument for why there is no component in the z-direction. Suppose the field points away from the plane. By reversing the current, we can make it point towards the plane (again from the B-S law). "But the z-component of B cannot possibly depend on the direction of the current in the xy plane."

I don't understand why this last sentence is so. My guess is that it is because the current can flow in infinitely many directions on the plane, but the z-component of B can only point either up or down.

Any clarification would be wonderful!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, suppose B had a component in the positive z direction. Then, if we reversed the flow (negative x direction), B would suddenly point in the negative z direction.

But the definition of where positive x is is arbitrary. So, how can the physical effect (B field) depend on an arbitrary choice?

Thus, there must be no B field in the z direction.
 
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
753
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K