Determining the quality of a physics program

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the quality of undergraduate physics programs, particularly for high school students aspiring to pursue a career in physics. Participants explore various factors and questions that can help assess the strength of different physics departments, including academic environment, faculty qualifications, research opportunities, and support for students.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest looking at rankings from sources like US News to gauge program quality.
  • Questions about the size, location, and selectivity of schools are raised to better understand the options available.
  • Concerns are expressed regarding the percentage of classes taught by teaching assistants (TAs) and the qualifications of faculty, with some arguing that TAs can be effective educators despite their status.
  • Participants propose a list of questions to ask physics departments, including inquiries about faculty qualifications, graduate school acceptance rates, research funding, and undergraduate research opportunities.
  • Some participants advocate for considering small liberal arts colleges, noting that they can provide strong preparation for graduate studies despite not being ranked among top universities.
  • Personal experiences are shared regarding the effectiveness of liberal arts education in developing skills beneficial for graduate school and research publishing.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of asking specific questions to assess program quality, but there are differing opinions on the value of small liberal arts colleges versus larger research universities. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which type of institution may be better suited for aspiring physics students.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the subjective nature of program quality assessments and the varying definitions of what constitutes a "good" physics program. The discussion reflects personal experiences and opinions, which may not apply universally.

Who May Find This Useful

Parents of high school students interested in pursuing physics, prospective undergraduate students, and individuals exploring educational pathways in STEM fields may find this discussion relevant.

jim musso
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm not sure if this forum is the right place for this. My son is a Junior in High School, he wants to have a career in Physics. We have been trying to find the right school for him in the northeast, where we live. It has been difficult, however, to determine which schools have great programs that would provide a solid foundation for him to then pursue a masters and PHd (which is his goal). What kind of questions should he ask an undergraduate Physics department, that would give him an idea of the quality of their program?

Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What kinds of schools are you looking at? How big? Urban, rural, or suburban? How selective?
 
The link Greg provided is a great resource. US News also allows you to list schools by region so you could filter them that, so you could do a search for schools in the northeast US, and you can search for the rankings of US physics graduate programs, but not undergraduate. They might have the undergraduate rankings if you're willing to pay for the full report, but you can usually extrapolate from the data they have available.

My Alma Mater has a very good program, all of my friends that were in it went on to graduate school, it's not in the northeast though. It's a bit further south.

From an undergraduate perspective, there's usually some concern over what percentage of classes are being taught by T.A.s. Universities are often judged on and ranked on this, The Princeton Review uses it in their rankings. TAs rarely taught courses at my university other than labs they mostly just graded things if you had one. I enjoyed the ones I had though, they were younger, more relate-able, and since they're still students barring any language barriers they're usually pretty decent are explaining things. So, I kind of feel like this one can be misleading, I've actually had some pretty good TAs but overall they get judged unfairly, kind of like faculty that only hold a masters and not a Ph.D. sometimes they're better teachers, but they're it's considered a mark against the school.

Anyway, people usually want to know:
The Pedigree Questions:
1) Percentage of classes taught by TAs?
2) Percentage of faculty that have a Ph.D.? Percentage of courses taught by staff not holding a Ph.D?
3) Number of tenured and non-tenured tracked faculty in the physics department?
4) Percentage of Undergraduates are accepted into graduate programs?
5) Average GRE scores of their undergraduates? Average score on the Physics Subject test?
6) Number of physics Ph.D.s that complete their dissertation each year and secure a post-doc position from that university?

Research at the University
7) What percentage of the total research dollars does the physics department bring into the university? Dollar amount?
8) What notable awards or grants has the physics department of university been awarded? (This can be easily looked up, not necessary to ask.)
9) What and who has been published recently at the university? (Another thing that can be looked up.)
10) What are the opportunities and availability like for undergraduates to get to lab experience outside of the classroom?
11) Are there any research opportunities available for undergraduates?
12) Do they offer REUs at their university? (REU - Research Experience for Undergraduates --- usually over the summer sponsored by the National Science Foundation.)

Etc
13) Is there a physics club? Do they have a physics honors society?
14) What is unique about their physics department?
15) Ask to sit in on a lecture or lab while touring the school.
16) You can ask if there's any community outreach programs, bringing physics demos to the k-12 schools, science for girls.
17) Ask about tutoring, supplemental lectures, what kind of guidance they offer for incoming freshmen and first year students to ensure that students successfully transition from high school to college.
18) Ask if they have an Honors College?
I think I'll cut myself off here, before I overwhelm you... Can I just say, shout out to you though looking for the best school for you kid. I think that's awesome.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
I suggest that you not rule out small liberal-arts colleges, if your son finds such an atmosphere to be congenial, and you can afford it. They don't show up on most lists of "top universities" but many of them do a very good job of preparing students for graduate school. Here's a post in another thread today with some links to information in this direction:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/does-the-school-i-graduate-from-matter.814641/#post-5113764

One of the linked articles itself links to another article that I'd like to call out specifically:

http://www.thecollegesolution.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/cech_article2.pdf

In the northeast, Williams, Swarthmore, Middlebury and Union come to my mind first, but there are others. I went to a small college in the midwest that isn't in their league, but nevertheless prepared me adequately for a Ph.D. at Michigan.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
jtbell said:
I suggest that you not rule out small liberal-arts colleges, if your son finds such an atmosphere to be congenial, and you can afford it.

As a graduate of a small liberal arts college, I wholeheartedly concur. The school I went to was a regional liberal arts school (a tier below places like Amherst or Swarthmore) but I was also more than adequately prepared for my PhD. I'd even go so far as to say that the extra focus on the liberal arts curriculum help develop my speaking and writing abilities, making it much easier to prepare conference presentations and journal articles later on in grad school. I published more than most other grad students in my year and I attribute that not to my scientific ability but instead to my ability to more quickly write a publication quality manuscript.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
9K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K