MHB Dexter's question at Yahoo Answers regarding related rates

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Related rates
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

View attachment 886

I have posted a link to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 

Attachments

  • dexter.jpg
    dexter.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 66
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Dexter,

I would let $E$ be the elevation of the observer, $h$ be the height of the elevator above the ground, and $w$ be the horizontal distance of the observer from the elevator shaft.

From the diagram, we see we mat then state:

$$\tan(\theta)=\frac{h-E}{w}$$

Differentiating with respect to time $t$ (recognizing that $\theta$ and $h$ are the only variables that change with time), we find:

$$\sec^2(\theta)\frac{d\theta}{dt}=\frac{1}{w}\frac{dh}{dt}$$

Multiplying through by $$\cos^2(\theta)$$, we get:

$$\frac{d\theta}{dt}=\frac{\cos^2(\theta)}{w}\frac{dh}{dt}$$

By Pythagoras, we know:

$$\cos^2(\theta)=\frac{w^2}{(h-E)^2+w^2}$$

and thus we may state:

$$\frac{d\theta}{dt}=\frac{w}{(h-E)^2+w^2}\frac{dh}{dt}$$

Plugging in the given data, we have (in radians per second):

$$\frac{d\theta}{dt}=\frac{54}{(h-21)^2+18^2}$$

And so to answer the questions, we find:

$$\left.\frac{d\theta}{dt} \right|_{h=15}=\frac{54}{(15-21)^2+18^2}=\frac{3}{20}$$

$$\left.\frac{d\theta}{dt} \right|_{h=39}=\frac{54}{(39-21)^2+18^2}=\frac{1}{12}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top