Diagonalising an n*n matrix analytically

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter A Dhingra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the diagonalization of a specific (2n+1)x(2n+1) matrix characterized by its diagonal terms and certain non-vanishing off-diagonal terms. Participants explore analytical methods for finding eigenvalues and diagonalization without resorting to numerical techniques, addressing both general and specific cases.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks help to diagonalize the matrix analytically for general n, recalling a previous instance where a professor used specific techniques for a fixed n.
  • Another participant suggests using the Gauß algorithm, indicating it can be done analytically and may yield a reasonable expression.
  • A participant mentions finding an iterative expression for the eigenvalues but notes the difficulty in proceeding without a fixed n.
  • It is pointed out that there is no algebraic method for exactly solving a general polynomial of degree 5 or higher, which may complicate the diagonalization process.
  • One participant questions whether the off-diagonal terms are uniform across the matrix and references the free Jacobi matrix, suggesting that its spectrum can be computed using Chebyshev polynomials, with implications for the original matrix's diagonalization.
  • Participants are encouraged to look into Jacobi matrices and orthogonal polynomials for further insights.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of diagonalizing the matrix analytically for general n, with some suggesting methods while others highlight inherent limitations in solving higher-degree polynomials. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the assumptions about the uniformity of off-diagonal terms and the general complexity of polynomial equations of degree 5 or higher, which may affect the diagonalization process.

A Dhingra
Messages
211
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone
I am trying to diagonalise a (2n+1)x(2n+1) matrix which has diagonal terms A_ll = (-n+l)^2 and other non vanishing terms are A_l(l+1) = A_(l+1)l = constant.
Is there any way I can solve it for general n without having to use any numerical methods.
I remember once a professor diagonalised such a matrix for a fixed value of n using some tricks, but I can't remember how he did that. Can anyone help me out here?

Any help is appreciated. Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Gauß algorithm should need about 4n steps (+- a few), and you can do it analytically and see if the result has some reasonable expression (but even if it does not, you get an analytic result).
 
Hi ...
I have managed to find an iterative expression to solve for the eigenvalues. But without selecting a fixed value of n I can't do anything with it. Any suggestions how I can go ahead with it.
Thanks mfb
 
Finding the eigenvalues for a matrix is equivalent to solving the n degree eigenvalue equation. There is NO algebraic method for exactly solving a general polynomial of degree 5 or higher.
 
Are you assuming that ##A_{j,j+1}= A_{j+1,j} = a ## for all ##j##? (i.e.> that ##a## is the same for all ##j##). If so, then the case when ##a=1## and all other entries are ##0## is the case of the so-called free Jacobi matrix. Its spectrum is computed in terms of Chebyshev polynomials. Your case then can be obtained by a simple affine transformation.

Even if your ##a##s are different, look up Jacobi matrices and orthogonal polynomials.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K