Diagonalizability of a matrix containing smaller diagonalizable matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter oferon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Matrix
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
oferon
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Please don't mind my math english, I'm really not used to it yet..

Given [itex]R\in M_n(F)[/itex] and two matrices [itex]A\in M_{n1}(F)[/itex] and [itex]D\in M_{n2}(F)[/itex] where [itex]n1+n2=n[/itex]
[itex]R = \begin{pmatrix} A & B \\ 0 & D \end{pmatrix}[/itex]
Given A,D both diagonalizable (over F), and don't share any identical eigenvalues - Prove that R is diagonalizable.

Ok, So what i did was building eigenvectors for R, based on the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A and D.
for example, suppose [itex]λ_1[/itex] is eigenvalue of A with eigenvector [itex]V = \begin{pmatrix} V1 \\ V2 \\. \\. \\. \end{pmatrix}[/itex], then taking [itex]U = \begin{pmatrix} V1 \\ V2 \\. \\. \\0 \\0\\0\end{pmatrix}[/itex] would give [itex]R*U = λ_1*U[/itex] thus λ1,U are eigenvalue and vector of R

I managed to do the same using D. So now I have a set of eigenvalues and vectors of R.
My question is - How can I tell that R has no other eigenvalues other than those of A and D, and finish my proof... Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you've shown that ##R## has ##n## linearly independent eigenvectors, since they come from different two matrices with no overlapping eigenvalues, and also where an eigenvalue does repeat within either ##A## or ##D##, the geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue is equal to its algebraic multiplicity (because ##A## and ##D## are both diagonalisable). Therefore, we can already write ##R## in the form ##PD P^{-1}## in the standard way; that is, ##R## is diagonalisable.

On the other hand, suppose there exists another eigenvalue of ##R## not covered by the eigenvalues of ##A## and ##D##. Then there must correspond an eigenvector that is linearly independent of all of the other eigenvectors of ##R##. But this means the eigenvectors of ##R## spans ##n+1## dimensions, which is not possible. So you cannot have another eigenvalue.
 
Thanks for your reply.
I still don't get it - I never said I found n eigenvectors. I said I found vectors for all eigen values of A and D.
How can you tell A gives total of n1 and D gives total of n2 vectors?
 
If an ##n\times n## matrix is diagonalisable, then it must have ##n## linearly independent eigenvectors. If you have a repeated eigenvalue with multiplicity ##k##, then the dimension of the corresponding eigenspace must also be ##k##. Is it possible you haven't found all the eigenvectors corresponding to each eigenvalue?