Diagonalizability of a matrix containing smaller diagonalizable matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter oferon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Matrix
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the diagonalizability of a matrix R constructed from two smaller diagonalizable matrices A and D, where R is defined as a block matrix. The original poster seeks to prove that R is diagonalizable given that A and D do not share any eigenvalues.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to construct eigenvectors for R based on those of A and D, questioning how to confirm that R has no additional eigenvalues beyond those of A and D. Other participants discuss the implications of having linearly independent eigenvectors and the conditions for diagonalizability.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the relationship between the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of R, A, and D. Some guidance has been offered regarding the requirements for diagonalizability, but the original poster expresses uncertainty about the completeness of their findings.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the dimensions of the eigenspaces corresponding to the eigenvalues of A and D, and whether the original poster has accounted for all necessary eigenvectors in their proof. The discussion also touches on the implications of repeated eigenvalues and their multiplicities.

oferon
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Please don't mind my math english, I'm really not used to it yet..

Given R\in M_n(F) and two matrices A\in M_{n1}(F) and D\in M_{n2}(F) where n1+n2=n
R = \begin{pmatrix} A & B \\ 0 & D \end{pmatrix}
Given A,D both diagonalizable (over F), and don't share any identical eigenvalues - Prove that R is diagonalizable.

Ok, So what i did was building eigenvectors for R, based on the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A and D.
for example, suppose λ_1 is eigenvalue of A with eigenvector V = \begin{pmatrix} V1 \\ V2 \\. \\. \\. \end{pmatrix}, then taking U = \begin{pmatrix} V1 \\ V2 \\. \\. \\0 \\0\\0\end{pmatrix} would give R*U = λ_1*U thus λ1,U are eigenvalue and vector of R

I managed to do the same using D. So now I have a set of eigenvalues and vectors of R.
My question is - How can I tell that R has no other eigenvalues other than those of A and D, and finish my proof... Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you've shown that ##R## has ##n## linearly independent eigenvectors, since they come from different two matrices with no overlapping eigenvalues, and also where an eigenvalue does repeat within either ##A## or ##D##, the geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue is equal to its algebraic multiplicity (because ##A## and ##D## are both diagonalisable). Therefore, we can already write ##R## in the form ##PD P^{-1}## in the standard way; that is, ##R## is diagonalisable.

On the other hand, suppose there exists another eigenvalue of ##R## not covered by the eigenvalues of ##A## and ##D##. Then there must correspond an eigenvector that is linearly independent of all of the other eigenvectors of ##R##. But this means the eigenvectors of ##R## spans ##n+1## dimensions, which is not possible. So you cannot have another eigenvalue.
 
Thanks for your reply.
I still don't get it - I never said I found n eigenvectors. I said I found vectors for all eigen values of A and D.
How can you tell A gives total of n1 and D gives total of n2 vectors?
 
If an ##n\times n## matrix is diagonalisable, then it must have ##n## linearly independent eigenvectors. If you have a repeated eigenvalue with multiplicity ##k##, then the dimension of the corresponding eigenspace must also be ##k##. Is it possible you haven't found all the eigenvectors corresponding to each eigenvalue?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K