Diagonalizing q1ˆ3q2ˆ3 with Degenerate Perturbation Theory

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of diagonalizing the perturbation q1ˆ3q2ˆ3 using degenerate perturbation theory. The first-order correction to the ground state is calculated using the expression $$\bra{GS} H_{int} \ket{GS}$$, where the ground state is defined as the vacuum state for two identical oscillators. The calculation involves evaluating the integral $$\bra{0}\bra{0} q_1^3 q_2^3 \ket{0} \ket{0}$$, which leads to integrals of the form $$\int dq_i q_i^3 e^{-2q_i^2}$$. A substitution of variables is suggested to simplify the integral, ultimately relating it to the Gamma function. This approach aims to resolve the difficulties encountered in finding the first-order correction.
ThiagoSantos
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Determine the first order correction of a system of two identical harmonic oscilators
Relevant Equations
Hˆ =(p1ˆ2 + p2ˆ2+q1ˆ2 +q2ˆ2)/2+fq1ˆ3q2ˆ3. where f is the coupling constant
I tried to use the degenerated perturbation theory but I'm having problems when it comes to diagonalizing the perturbation q1ˆ3q2ˆ3 which I think I need to find the first order correction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am rusty, but I try.

According to Wikipedia the first-order correction is
$$\bra{GS} H_{int} \ket{GS}$$
(assuming you want to calculate the correction to the ground state ##\ket{GS}##). Your ground state is the vacuum for both oscillators so ##\ket{GS} = \ket{0}\ket{0}##. Where ##\ket{0} \propto \exp(- \omega_i q_i^2)## with ##i = 1,2##.(here you have two identical oscillators so ##\omega_1 = \omega_2 = 1##). So you just have to calculate:
$$\bra{0}\bra{0} q_1^3 q_2^3 \ket{0} \ket{0}$$
which (if I am not mistaken) will result in integrals of the form
$$\int dq_i q_i^3 e^{-2q_i^2} $$
you can solve this by putting ##t=x^2## (##dt = 2xdx##), which will yield the Gamma function (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function).
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top