Diagrams for nucleon scattering

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Feynman diagrams for nucleon-nucleon scattering involving complex and real scalar fields. It is established that only two diagrams exist at tree level due to the interaction term ψ*ψΦ, which necessitates specific particle configurations at each vertex. The conversation clarifies that fermions, specifically nucleons (protons and neutrons), are indeed Dirac fermions in this context, and the connection of fermions must adhere to the directionality of their arrows in the diagrams. Thus, the proposed additional diagram is impossible under these constraints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and their components
  • Familiarity with complex and real scalar fields
  • Knowledge of Dirac fermions and their properties
  • Basic principles of quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the construction of Feynman diagrams in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the interaction terms in quantum field theories, specifically ψ*ψΦ
  • Explore the role of fermions in Yukawa theory and their implications
  • Investigate the properties of Dirac fermions and their significance in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and anyone studying quantum field theory and particle interactions will benefit from this discussion.

carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3
According to Tong there are two Feynman diagrams for nucleon-nucleon scattering in the interaction of the complex and real scalar fields, but I can draw another diagram where the p1 and p2 particles enter a vertex and the p1' and p2' particles go out of another vertex (linked to the first one by a dotted real-field line, of course). Why is this diagram impossible?

I think it is because the interaction term is ψ*ψΦ, so every vertex requires a real field particle plus either a particle going in and an antiparticle going out or an antiparticle-particle pair both going out or going in. Is that so?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The vertex consists of a dotted line, representing the meson and in incoming and an outgoing fermion line (representing ##\psi## and ##\bar{\psi}##). Now connecting two points stands for contractions. The contraction of two ##\psi##'s or two ##\bar{\psi}##'s gives 0. So you can connect fermions only in the proper sense of the arrows. So there are indeed only two diagrams at tree level (consisting of two vertices). So your assumption is correct.
 
vanhees71 said:
The vertex consists of a dotted line, representing the meson and in incoming and an outgoing fermion line (representing ##\psi## and ##\bar{\psi}##). Now connecting two points stands for contractions. The contraction of two ##\psi##'s or two ##\bar{\psi}##'s gives 0. So you can connect fermions only in the proper sense of the arrows. So there are indeed only two diagrams at tree level (consisting of two vertices). So your assumption is correct.

Thanks for your answer. Just a little doubt: I don't understand why are you talking about fermions. I thought fermions were the particles of the Dirac field. Did you think I was talking about Yukawa theory or are complex field particles also called fermions?
 
Well, I thought you talk about nucleons, i.e., protons and neutrons. A particle's name includes all its properties, and nucleons are Dirac fermions in the effective theory described in your source.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K