Diamond-based CPU's: Advantages & Applications in Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter albert281
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diamond
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential advantages and applications of diamond-based semiconductors, particularly in the context of CPU technology. Participants explore the feasibility of using diamond as a semiconductor compared to traditional silicon, considering factors such as manufacturing processes, thermal properties, and possible applications in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that diamond is a superior semiconductor due to its high melting temperature and thermal conductivity, potentially allowing for higher CPU frequencies and performance.
  • Others raise concerns about the cost and speed of diamond wafer production compared to silicon, arguing that the current manufacturing processes for diamond are slower and more expensive.
  • There are discussions about the challenges of doping diamond to create P or N type semiconductors, with some noting that impurities needed for effective doping may not provide suitable energy levels for practical conductivity.
  • Some participants mention potential applications in high-temperature environments and signal transduction, highlighting the unique properties of diamond that could be advantageous in these areas.
  • A few participants express skepticism about the immediate viability of diamond semiconductors in the market, citing the need for further development in manufacturing techniques.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the feasibility and advantages of diamond semiconductors compared to silicon. Multiple competing views remain regarding the manufacturing challenges, cost implications, and potential applications.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the current understanding of diamond doping processes and the economic feasibility of large-scale diamond semiconductor production. There is also uncertainty regarding the specific applications in physics that would benefit from diamond semiconductors.

albert281
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
So I was looking online at a company called Apollo diamond...they have a method for making diamond called chemical vapor deposition. Essentially, it is a method where a seed diamond is placed in a carbon gas and layer upon layer of carbon atoms are deposited on the seed and the diamond grows accordingly.

Currently the semiconductor industry uses silicon as its medium of choice...but diamond is a better semiconductor. Given the high melting temperature of diamond, as opposed to silicon, clearly CPU's would no longer be constrained at running around 4Ghz...and with multiple cores, we are talking about computing power increases that are almost unimaginable.

Does anyone know of any applications in physics that such a semiconductor would be advantageous over current designs? I am thinking high temp environments...but surely there are other applications?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Albert281 said:
So I was looking online at a company called Apollo diamond...they have a method for making diamond called chemical vapor deposition. Essentially, it is a method where a seed diamond is placed in a carbon gas and layer upon layer of carbon atoms are deposited on the seed and the diamond grows accordingly.

Currently the semiconductor industry uses silicon as its medium of choice...but diamond is a better semiconductor. Given the high melting temperature of diamond, as opposed to silicon, clearly CPU's would no longer be constrained at running around 4Ghz...and with multiple cores, we are talking about computing power increases that are almost unimaginable.

Does anyone know of any applications in physics that such a semiconductor would be advantageous over current designs? I am thinking high temp environments...but surely there are other applications?

At a guess, I'd say that the main factor would be the price, I'd say the process to make a semiconductor from silicon is probably cheaper than the process for diamonds.
 
Vagn said:
At a guess, I'd say that the main factor would be the price, I'd say the process to make a semiconductor from silicon is probably cheaper than the process for diamonds.

I disagree that price in manufacturing would be a problem...as it is, prices for chips are mostly for the R&D into the design, then of course operating profit and anything else they can get from the consumer. The same would hold true for diamonds. Think about it...a small seed diamond can be wafer sized merely by depositing carbon from a gas. The cost for a one carat white diamond of exceptional clarity should drop to a very low value. De'Beers may have something to say about this in that the guys at apollo may have to hire bodyguards (if they already haven't), but cost shouldn't be an issue when manufacturing at this scale. Incidentally...diamonds are only as expensive as they are because of hoarding by De'Beers.
 
You are missing a major factor. In a few hours they pull a large Si ingot from a furnace full of molten Si. This ingot it then sawed into hundreds of SI wafers.

In that same few hours a SINGLE diamond wafer would be created by deposition in a vacuum chamber. So not only is the process itself more expensive for diamond then Si it is also much slower. Further it is likely the deposition process is in need of a significant amount of development in order to produce a diamond wafer.

I would not count on diamonds stealing the wafer market from Si just yet.
 
Integral said:
You are missing a major factor. In a few hours they pull a large Si ingot from a furnace full of molten Si. This ingot it then sawed into hundreds of SI wafers.

In that same few hours a SINGLE diamond wafer would be created by deposition in a vacuum chamber. So not only is the process itself more expensive for diamond then Si it is also much slower. Further it is likely the deposition process is in need of a significant amount of development in order to produce a diamond wafer.

I would not count on diamonds stealing the wafer market from Si just yet.

No doubt there is some work left on manufacturing silicon wafers...but theoretically, what would stop them from laying out a football field of seed diamonds and building a giant sheet of wafers? I don't think there is a need for a significant amount of development for building a wafer...they are already selling diamonds using this process for jewelry. Technically, there should be no reason, aside from engineering, that this method couldn't be made economically feasible.
 
Let's get this thread back on the original question please...
 
Albert281 said:
No doubt there is some work left on manufacturing silicon wafers...but theoretically, what would stop them from laying out a football field of seed diamonds and building a giant sheet of wafers?.

CVD is used to grow Sapphire (AlOx) for some image sensors.
Diamond has some advantageous as a base for ICs - because of it's high thermal conductivity - but I haven't heard of any big advantages as an actual semiconductor.
 
"Does anyone know of any applications in physics that such a semiconductor would be advantageous over current designs? I am thinking high temp environments...but surely there are other applications?"

This is the original topic of the post. Indeed it is a good one. There is a growing body of work concerning the issues of diamonds for signal transduction. I think another good property is that since they are made of carbon there is an extra advantage to any type of organic coupling. However i am not knowledgeable about the physics too much.
 
NobodySpecial said:
CVD is used to grow Sapphire (AlOx) for some image sensors.
Diamond has some advantageous as a base for ICs - because of it's high thermal conductivity - but I haven't heard of any big advantages as an actual semiconductor.

The main advantage in the semiconductor industry, I believe, would be the thermal characteristics. Running a CPU at 81Ghz is very alluring.
 
  • #10
As far as I know, the problem with diamond is about the impurities needed to turn it into P or N type. The impurities that match the lattice constant provide energy levels too far away from the conduction or the valence bands. Thus, at room temperature there is very little ionization and the conductivity is too small to manufacture a practical doped semiconductor.
 
  • #11
Gordianus said:
As far as I know, the problem with diamond is about the impurities needed to turn it into P or N type. The impurities that match the lattice constant provide energy levels too far away from the conduction or the valence bands. Thus, at room temperature there is very little ionization and the conductivity is too small to manufacture a practical doped semiconductor.

I don't know anything about this...but I do know that a transistor has been made from diamond doped with boron. The latest news I found regarding diamond transistors:

http://www.physorg.com/news158946763.html
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1044396/-diamond-transistor-clocks-120ghz
 
  • #12
Kmenex said:
"Does anyone know of any applications in physics that such a semiconductor would be advantageous over current designs? I am thinking high temp environments...but surely there are other applications?"

This is the original topic of the post. Indeed it is a good one. There is a growing body of work concerning the issues of diamonds for signal transduction. I think another good property is that since they are made of carbon there is an extra advantage to any type of organic coupling. However i am not knowledgeable about the physics too much.

This, if it is true, is very exciting! Do you have any more information on this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
839
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
398
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K