Diatomic molecule at a constant temperature

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the time evolution of a diatomic molecule, specifically ##D_{2}##, at a constant temperature of 30K, starting from the initial state ##| \psi (0) \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{26}}(3 | 1,1 \rangle + 4| 7,3 \rangle + | 7,1 \rangle )##. Participants consider using the Hamiltonian for a rotator, expressed as ##H = \frac{L^2}{2I}##, but express uncertainty about how temperature factors into the problem. The canonical formalism suggests that the probability of states should follow the relation ##P \propto e^{-\beta E}##, yet there is confusion about integrating this with the rotator model. Ultimately, it is proposed to treat the molecule as an isolated system at ##t=0##, setting aside temperature considerations for the time being. The focus remains on deriving ##| \psi (t) \rangle ## without explicit environmental coupling.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
All below...
Relevant Equations
.
A diatomic molecule ##D_{2}## in ##30K##, in ##t=0##, is in the state ##| \psi (0) \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{26}}(3 | 1,1 \rangle + 4| 7,3 \rangle + | 7,1 \rangle )##, where the kets denote states ##| l,m \rangle##. Use ##\frac{\hbar}{Ic4\pi}=30.4cm^{-1}##.

Obtain ##| \psi (t) \rangle ##

I think the main point here is to deduce what is the Hamiltonian of the system. But i don't know waht could i use!

First i thought it could be a rotator, so ##H = \frac{L^2}{2I}##. But doing so, i am not sure how the temperatura enters in the problem!

It seems that the probability should follows the canonical formalism, so ##P \propto e^{-\beta E}##, where ##P## is the probability of the state with energy ##E##. But how to connect it to a rotator?
(If the rotator idea is correct)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without an explicit coupling to the environment, there is no way to solve this for the case of constant temperature.

As the molecule is in a pure state at ##t=0##, I would continue treating it as an isolated system and disregard the mention of temperature.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top