MHB Did I Calculate My Funds Distribution Correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SJSuser
  • Start date Start date
SJSuser
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have to make a distribution of Funds. The Funds are X and include cash and a cd if which if cashed in now would be at present value 78,572.32
because of early withdrawal penalty but it was 80,000 invested initially. Funds X will be later added to Funds Y . The funds must be split four ways. I am one of the four. A, B, C, D . I am D . I don't want to cash the cd in because 1,428 or the difference between 78,572.38 and 80,000 would be lost. I want to contribute 1428 of my own funds in acct E nothing to do with A B C or D to make it 80,000 or the orginal amt invested and then have my cash share D to be 1/4 X minus 80,000 cd plus Y. Does that look right? I will take the cd over to my D account . Fair ? Did I do the math correctly?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let me see if I have this right- You have a total amount of "X" that includes the current $78,572.32 in the CD- so apparently X- 78,572.32 in cash. I recommend this: first explain everything and what you are going to do so you won't have three people angry with you, then give each person (X- $78,572.32)/4, their share of the cash. Then later, after the CD has matured, give each person $80,000/4= $20,000.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Let me see if I have this right- You have a total amount of "X" that includes the current $78,572.32 in the CD- so apparently X- 78,572.32 in cash. I recommend this: first explain everything and what you are going to do so you won't have three people angry with you, then give each person (X- $78,572.32)/4, their share of the cash. Then later, after the CD has matured, give each person $80,000/4= $20,000.
Thank you for your help. I must as Trustee distribute the cd now by law and all monies in the Trust to the 4 other Trusts equally, one of which is mine and file a final return for the deceased’s Trust 3.5 months after. I first took 1428 out of my individual acct and added it to the Trust acct holding the cd to make 80000 so as to put the cd in my Trust and hold it to maturity and I would give myself 80000 less in cash distribution from the total corpus. But I backed that 1428 out today because I am now out 1428 to get 80000. I don't see anyway but to cash the cd in for 78,582. If i keep it that is not fair to the other Trusts and if contribute 1428 to the Trust and take the cd to my Trust I am paying for it and i really got 78,582. The cd is a part of a larger Trust corpus which must be distributed 4 ways. I just don't get the math. I’ll just lose the Trust 1428. The cd is a small part of the Trust’s corpus. I thought I could give the trust 1428 from my individual money and take the cd and then subtract 80,000 from the total cash I get. My math is off somewhere. I’ll just cash the cd in early and lose the 1428 and interest. I can't hold it outside my Trust and it must be distributed now to close out the Trust and dissolve it. I am the only one with a Trust acct that can take the transferred cd. There should be a mathematical formula that can be used for all this tangled up money. I need to dissolve the Trust asap. I thought giving the Trust my money the 1428 would work but I don't know the math to subtract that cd from my 1/4 share of the total money because it’s not just 80,000 is it? I would have paid 1428 for the benefit of eventual 80,000 and that is not fair to me?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top