Did I do this angular acceleration problem right?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the angular acceleration of blender blades that decelerate from a high rotational speed to rest over a specified time period. The subject area pertains to rotational motion and angular kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conversion of rotational speed from revolutions per minute (rpm) to radians per second (rad/s) and the subsequent calculation of angular acceleration. There are questions about the correctness of the initial conversion and the calculations presented.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the unit conversion process, with some participants expressing doubt about the accuracy of the calculations. Multiple interpretations of the conversion method are being explored, and participants are emphasizing the importance of correct unit conversions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for careful attention to unit conversions, specifically the transition from minutes to seconds and revolutions to radians. There is a noted emphasis on the significance of these conversions in achieving accurate results.

zeromodz
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
The blades in a blender rotate at a rate of 7000 rpm. When the motor is turned off during operation, the blades slow to rest in 3.4 s.
What is the angular acceleration as the blades slow down?



Lets first convert rpm to rps and then multiply by 2π to get its angular velocity.

7000rpm * 60 = 420000 rps * 2π = 2638937.829 rad/s

Now just simply use.

Wf = Wi + AT
A = Wf - Wi / T
A = (0) - (2638937.829) / (3.4)
A = -776158.185 rad/s^2 <-----Answer

The answer is negative because its decelerating.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zeromodz said:
7000rpm * 60 = 420000 rps * 2π = 2638937.829 rad/s

Are you sure about that?
 
bp_psy said:
Are you sure about that?

Yes you have to convert it into rps to get seconds and then multiply times 2 pie to get radians per second.
 
zeromodz said:
Yes you have to convert it into rps to get seconds and then multiply times 2 pie to get radians per second.

1min= 60s not the other way around
 
zeromodz said:
Yes you have to convert it into rps to get seconds and then multiply times 2 pie to get radians per second.

Calculate again. Your answer is wrong. rev convert to radian, minute convert to second.
Unit conversion is very important. Becareful / * sign .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K