- #1
L'Arrogant
- 3
- 0
As a student, I constantly think about the program I'm in. I'm an undergrad right now attending a school that's, while private and well funded, not much in rank. It is big, though.
I'm also enrolled in a pretty competitive liberal arts college. I'm actually matric there, but not attending for reasons that don't really have much to do with academics.
My question for you all: as people who have no doubt attended a variety of schools, am I going to miss out by staying where I am? Not necessarily whether a good gpa from a less competitive school is going to look worse to some future employer, but are there remarkable differences between curricula?
From what I hear, certain universities try to weed out, even intimidate students, while others are far too lax, inflating grades and ignoring material. From what I see, it's a good deal more complicated.
There is certainly a marked difference in student bodies, but I've heard time and time again that professors know their stuff in almost all cases, mostly because in math and physics the things taught at an undergrad level are often pretty trivial. Is this true? It seems to me that even very simple ideas can be delicate, and most importantly fundamental.
These seem kind of like annoying questions to ask when I see them written, but as a student I'm disoriented.
I'm also enrolled in a pretty competitive liberal arts college. I'm actually matric there, but not attending for reasons that don't really have much to do with academics.
My question for you all: as people who have no doubt attended a variety of schools, am I going to miss out by staying where I am? Not necessarily whether a good gpa from a less competitive school is going to look worse to some future employer, but are there remarkable differences between curricula?
From what I hear, certain universities try to weed out, even intimidate students, while others are far too lax, inflating grades and ignoring material. From what I see, it's a good deal more complicated.
There is certainly a marked difference in student bodies, but I've heard time and time again that professors know their stuff in almost all cases, mostly because in math and physics the things taught at an undergrad level are often pretty trivial. Is this true? It seems to me that even very simple ideas can be delicate, and most importantly fundamental.
These seem kind of like annoying questions to ask when I see them written, but as a student I'm disoriented.