Did Planck view light as a particle or a wave?

Click For Summary
Planck viewed light primarily as an electromagnetic wave, consistent with the scientific understanding of his time. His radiation law introduced the concept of energy quantization, suggesting that light was emitted in discrete quanta, but he did not attribute any deeper significance to this idea. Planck believed that this quantization applied only to the oscillators in the walls of a cavity, not to light itself. It was Albert Einstein who later proposed that light consists of particles, known as photons, to explain the photoelectric effect. Ultimately, Planck's contributions were more about mathematical modeling than a definitive stance on the nature of light.
6021023
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Did Planck think that light was a particle or a wave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AFAIK Planck, like all his contemporaries, believed light was an electromagnetic wave (which it really is, the way it's seen now is that it's just that electromagnetic waves in general don't behave quite like how we thought).

Now, the thing about Planck's radiation law is that it implies light was emitted in discrete quanta of energy (c.f. the h\nu term in Planck's law with the \Delta E in the Boltzmann distribution).

But (as opposed to how it often gets described) Planck did not actually put any deeper import on that fact. He didn't really assume there were photons, or that energy/light was quantized (rather that, the 'oscillators' as he called atoms/molecules, emitted light in quanta).

There's an http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/373" here that attempts to set the record straight on Planck's contributions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
6021023 said:
Did Planck think that light was a particle or a wave?

I think it was Einstein, who realized that light was made out of particles.

From the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law:
Planck made this quantization assumption five years before Albert Einstein hypothesized the existence of photons as a means of explaining the photoelectric effect. At the time, Planck believed that the quantization applied only to the tiny oscillators that were thought to exist in the walls of the cavity (what we now know to be atoms), and made no assumption that light itself propagates in discrete bundles or packets of energy. Moreover, Planck did not attribute any physical significance to this assumption, but rather believed that it was merely a mathematical device that enabled him to derive a single expression for the black body spectrum that matched the empirical data at all wavelengths.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
719
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K