Did the Chicxulub Area Contribute to Oil Reserves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Delta Force
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Oil
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential relationship between the Chicxulub impact event and the formation or preservation of petroleum reserves in the surrounding areas, including Mexico, the Gulf of Mexico, Texas, and Louisiana. Participants explore geological implications, the role of impact craters in hydrocarbon accumulation, and comparisons with other impact sites.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the Chicxulub impact may have contributed to the creation of caprock and favorable geological conditions for trapping oil reserves.
  • Others argue that while the Chicxulub area contains many petroleum-rich locations, the correlation between impact craters and oil reserves is not definitively established, citing the Chesapeake Bay as a larger impact site with less oil.
  • A participant references a report indicating that some impact structures in North America are of interest for petroleum exploration, noting that not all craters yield hydrocarbons.
  • One participant shares personal research experience in the Gulf of Mexico, mentioning significant geological formations that may or may not be linked to the Chicxulub impact.
  • There is a discussion about the geological effects of impact events, including the creation of fractures in the crust that could facilitate petroleum movement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the relationship between impact events and petroleum reserves, with no clear consensus on the extent of the Chicxulub impact's influence or the validity of comparisons with other craters.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on geological interpretations and the definitions of terms like "impact crater" and "petroleum-rich areas," which may vary among participants. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the geological processes involved and the specific contributions of impact events to hydrocarbon formation.

Delta Force
Messages
81
Reaction score
7
Many petroleum rich areas are located within the Chicxulub impact effects radius, including Mexico, the Gulf of Mexico, Texas, and Louisiana. Cantarell, a supergiant petroleum field, is located directly within the impact crater. Did Chicxulub play any role in creating and/or preserving proto-petroleum fields to the modern day (especially through the creation of caprock), or are the petroleum rich areas found nearby just a coincidence due to the large area within the effects radius?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Oil is collected in anti/-synclinal geologic features (in general) and the crater you mentioned is possibly contributed to the favorable geological conditions for trapping oil reserves.

But, the Chesapeake Bay is an even bigger, newer impact crater and there's as of yet not a particularly amazing amount of oil found there, so the correlation doesn't appear to be strong.
 
Report by a petroleum Geologist for management readers, I think. This means its readable. The bottom line is the impact craters in some areas are of great interest for finding new petroleum reserves - in a limited way:
Seventeen confirmed impact structures occur in petroliferous areas of North America, nine of which are being exploited for commercial hydrocarbons
From: http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-96/issue-19/in-this-issue/general-interest/north-american-impact-structures-hold-giant-field-potential.html
Have a read. I think IDneon is on the right track. But not all craters or astroblemes have petroleum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Delta Force said:
Many petroleum rich areas are located within the Chicxulub impact effects radius, including Mexico, the Gulf of Mexico, Texas, and Louisiana. Cantarell, a supergiant petroleum field, is located directly within the impact crater. Did Chicxulub play any role in creating and/or preserving proto-petroleum fields to the modern day (especially through the creation of caprock), or are the petroleum rich areas found nearby just a coincidence due to the large area within the effects radius?
I had a research project out in the Gulf Of Mexico in 1984, since we were a research vessel,
we were out past the shelve, so as not to disruptthe crews actually making money.
The live plotter records like every 10th line, but is readable.
We recorded what many said was the largest salt dome they had ever seen,
it looked to be about 1000 feet high, and about 90 miles across.
It was also under about 5400 feet of water!
There is a massive formation under the Gulf of Mexico, weather it is a result of the
big impact off of Mexico would be difficult to say, but geophysical activity does
change the strata and allow traps to form.
 
IDNeon said:
But, the Chesapeake Bay is an even bigger, newer impact crater
Is it? Wiki pages give half the diameter of Chicxulub.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
I'd expect any impact event would create fractures in the crust (at least), and these would provide paths through which existing petroleum can percolate. If the cracks are disposed radially from the impact point, then fluids would preferentially move towards or away from their center, depending on pressure gradients. The presence of preferential paths of diffusion and convection is what generally leads to the formation of ore deposits of all kinds, so I wouldn't expect petroleum to be much different.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 133 ·
5
Replies
133
Views
28K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K