rollcast
- 403
- 0
Difference between approach for show that ... and prove that ...
Whats the difference between how you solve a problem that involves showing or proving something?
For example what would be the difference between the solution to:
"Show that [itex]\sin\theta(2cos\theta+sin\theta)[/itex] can be written as [itex]3tan\theta[/itex] "
and
"Prove that [itex]\sin\theta(2cos\theta+sin\theta) = 3tan\theta[/itex] "
Admittedly that's a pretty poor and basic example.
To me the solution to both of them should be the same or is there any difference?
Thanks
A
Whats the difference between how you solve a problem that involves showing or proving something?
For example what would be the difference between the solution to:
"Show that [itex]\sin\theta(2cos\theta+sin\theta)[/itex] can be written as [itex]3tan\theta[/itex] "
and
"Prove that [itex]\sin\theta(2cos\theta+sin\theta) = 3tan\theta[/itex] "
Admittedly that's a pretty poor and basic example.
To me the solution to both of them should be the same or is there any difference?
Thanks
A