Difference between current and voltage preamplifier?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences between current and voltage preamplifiers in the context of building a transient photocurrent/photovoltage setup. A current preamplifier features low input impedance, ideally zero, while a voltage preamplifier has high input impedance to minimize sensor loading. For optimal performance with a 5ns laser pulse, an avalanche photodiode is recommended due to its fast response time. Suggested preamplifiers include OPA620, OPA648 from Texas Instruments, and AD743, AD8001 from Analog Devices, among others.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of photodetector types: phototransistor, photodiode, avalanche photodiode
  • Knowledge of preamplifier configurations: current vs. voltage preamplifiers
  • Familiarity with circuit design principles, including feedback resistance and stray capacitance
  • Experience with high-speed signal processing and oscilloscope measurements
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Transimpedance amplifier design" for high-speed applications
  • Learn about "Avalanche photodiode biasing" techniques
  • Explore "PCB design for high-frequency circuits" to minimize stray capacitance
  • Review "Application notes for OPA620 and OPA648" for specific design considerations
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and researchers involved in optical signal processing, particularly those designing high-speed photodetection systems and requiring in-depth knowledge of preamplifier configurations.

swami.me
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am trying to build a transient photocurrent/photovoltage setup and I was wondering what is the difference between current and voltage preamplifier? Here is a detailed desciption of my setup

I will be providing a a very short laser pulse (5ns) to a photodetector in either open circuit or short circuit conditions and measuring the photovoltage and photocurrent respectively through an oscilloscope by connecting the output of photodetector using a preamplifier and then oscilloscope.

Please let me know
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In general, a current preamp has a low input impedance, maybe ideally zero. (*) A voltage preamp has a high input impedance to present minimal loading of the sensor.

(*) there may be conflicting goals: zero impedance to not affect linearity where the sensor has non-linear impedance, and ideally a matching impedance for best S/N performance.
 
Photodetector preamplifiers, photovoltaic mode, photoconductive mode, and selecting the right photosensor (phototransistor, photodiode, and a few others) are clearly described here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photodiode

Since your optical input pulse will be only 5nS in duration an ordinary phototransistor would not react fast enough. You will need to use a circuit using an avalanche photodiode that is reversed biased. This complicates the design because you will need something like minus 20 or 30 volts for the bias.
 
Last edited:
Swami.me, here are some suggestions for your amplifier:

OPA620, OPA648, Texas Instruments
AD743, AD8001, Analog Devices
LT1360, Linear Technology
or HA5160, Harris

A ceramic capacitor of 0.1uF should be connected to the power input pin of the amplifier and grounded at a minimum distance.

For high speed/high rise times a Transimpedance amplifier configuration is often used. The time response of your amplifier greatly depends on the time constant of the feedback resistance and its parallel stray capacitance. To minimize the effect of this time constant, connect two or more resistors in series as the feedback resistance so as to disperse the parallel stray capacitance. If a bandwidth of over 100 MHz is desired and if the amplifier has its own internal feedback resistors, using them would help reduce the stray capacitance, reduce the overall circuit size, and suppress the undesired effects of lead inductance of each external component. You may select which of the suggested amplifiers have these on-chip resistors. Another performance enhancement would be to use a ground plane structure where the entire copper surface of the PC board is at ground potential.

Here is a National Semiconductor application note entitled “Design Considerations for a Transimpedance Amplifier: (the link takes you to a TI site, but the app note is National Application Note 1803)

http://www.ti.com/general/docs/lit/getliterature.tsp?svadoc=an-1803&reg=en
 
Last edited:
Most likely this can only be answered by an "old timer". I am making measurements on an uA709 op amp (metal can). I would like to calculate the frequency rolloff curves (I can measure them). I assume the compensation is via the miller effect. To do the calculations I would need to know the gain of the transistors and the effective resistance seen at the compensation terminals, not including the values I put there. Anyone know those values?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
557
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K