Difference between d²y/d²x and d²y/dx²

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rohanprabhu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between the notations d²y/d²x and d²y/dx², particularly in the context of parametric functions. Participants explore the mathematical significance of these derivatives, how to compute them, and the implications of using different notations for higher-order derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a parametric function and calculates the first and second derivatives, leading to questions about the meaning of d²y/d²x.
  • Another participant asserts that d²y/d²x does not exist, emphasizing the distinction in notation.
  • There is a challenge regarding the correctness of the second derivative calculation, with different results being obtained using various functions.
  • A participant explains the process of reparametrizing y as a function of x and discusses the implications of this change on the derivatives.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their calculations and the applicability of the formulas they have been using.
  • One participant shares a realization about a potential misunderstanding of the formula for the second-order derivative of a parametric function.
  • Another participant confirms that the formula provided aligns with what they were taught, indicating a potential resolution of confusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of d²y/d²x, with some asserting it does not exist while others explore its implications. There are also competing views on the correctness of the second derivative calculations, leading to unresolved disagreements.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about specific calculations and the applicability of certain formulas, indicating potential limitations in their understanding or the scope of the discussion.

rohanprabhu
Messages
410
Reaction score
2
Considering a parametric function:

<br /> y = sin(\theta)<br />
<br /> x = cos(\theta)<br />

I want to find it's second order derivative.

<br /> \frac{dy}{d\theta} = cos(\theta) <br />

<br /> \frac{dx}{d\theta} = -sin(\theta)<br />

Therefore, I can say that:

<br /> \frac{dy}{dx} = -cot(\theta)<br />

Also,

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{d\theta^2} = -sin(\theta)<br />

<br /> \frac{d^2x}{d\theta^2} = -cos(\theta)<br />

Hence,

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{d^2x} = tan(\theta)<br />

But, If i need the second order derivate, what i actually need is:

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = \frac{d}{d\theta}(\frac{dy}{dx})\times(\frac{d\theta}{dx})<br />

which turns out to be:

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = -cosec^3(\theta)<br />

So, basically, what is the difference between d²y/d²x and d²y/dx². And how can we arrive at the formula for d²y/dx²? I mean, what is the mathematical significance of that? And how to do it for higher order derivatives, let's say 3 or 4 for example.

Also, does something like d²y/d²x even exist? what does it mean?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
rohanprabhu said:
Also, does something like d²y/d²x even exist?
No, it does not exist. We specifically use the notation d2y/dx2 to indicate that something more than mere division (as you did in the original post) is taking place.
 
rohanprabhu said:
But, If i need the second order derivate, what i actually need is:

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = \frac{d}{d\theta}(\frac{dy}{dx})\times(\frac{d\theta}{dx})<br />

which turns out to be:

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = cosec(\theta)<br />
Are you sure that's right? I think I get a different answer using y =\sqrt{1-x^2}...
 
I'll explain two things. First how to do this

rohanprabhu said:
Considering a parametric function:

<br /> y = sin(\theta)<br />
<br /> x = cos(\theta)<br />

I want to find it's second order derivative.

<br /> \frac{dy}{d\theta} = cos(\theta) <br />

<br /> \frac{dx}{d\theta} = -sin(\theta)<br />

Therefore, I can say that:

<br /> \frac{dy}{dx} = -cot(\theta)<br />

more rigorously, and then why I think that this

Also,

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{d\theta^2} = -sin(\theta)<br />

<br /> \frac{d^2x}{d\theta^2} = -cos(\theta)<br />

Hence,

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{d^2x} = tan(\theta)<br />

But, If i need the second order derivate, what i actually need is:

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = \frac{d}{d\theta}(\frac{dy}{dx})\times(\frac{d\theta}{dx})<br />

which turns out to be:

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = cosec(\theta)<br />

is wrong.

If we first have functions

<br /> \theta\mapsto y(\theta)<br />
<br /> \theta\mapsto x(\theta)<br />

and you want to reparametrize y as a function of x, to get some function x\mapsto y, strictly speaking this is going to be different function y, so it would be clearer to give it a different notation. I'll put \tilde{y}. We must assume that we can invert the mapping \theta\mapsto x(\theta) to a mapping x\mapsto \theta(x), and then y and y-tilde are related by

<br /> \tilde{y}(x) = y(\theta(x))<br />

The derivative is then

<br /> \frac{d\tilde{y}(x)}{dx} = D_x y(\theta(x)) = \frac{dy(\theta(x))}{d\theta} \frac{d\theta(x)}{dx},<br />

or

<br /> \frac{dy}{d\theta}\frac{d\theta}{dx}<br />

for short, without parameters. In your example we must assume (for example) \theta &gt; 0 so that \theta(x)=\cos^{-1}(x) exists. Then we can substitute

<br /> \frac{dy}{d\theta} = \cos\theta<br />

<br /> \frac{d\theta}{dx} = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x^2}} = -\frac{1}{\sin\theta}<br />

and get

<br /> \frac{d\tilde{y}}{dx} = -\frac{\cos\theta}{\sin\theta} = -\cot\theta<br />

You got this same result more easily, but check what the second derivative turns out to be.

<br /> \frac{d^2\tilde{y}(x)}{dx^2} = D_x\Big(\frac{dy(\theta(x))}{d\theta} \frac{d\theta(x)}{dx}\Big) = \Big(D_x \frac{dy(\theta(x))}{d\theta}\Big) \frac{d\theta(x)}{dx}\; + \;\frac{dy(\theta(x))}{d\theta}\Big( D_x \frac{d\theta(x)}{dx}\Big)<br />

<br /> = \Big(\frac{d^2 y(\theta(x))}{d\theta^2} \frac{d\theta(x)}{dx}\Big) \frac{d\theta(x)}{dx}\; +\; \frac{dy(\theta(x))}{d\theta} \frac{d^2\theta(x)}{dx^2} = \frac{d^2 y(\theta(x))}{d\theta^2} \Big(\frac{d\theta(x)}{dx}\Big)^2\; +\; \frac{dy(\theta(x))}{d\theta} \frac{d^2\theta(x)}{dx^2}<br />

or

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{d\theta^2} \Big(\frac{d\theta}{dx}\Big)^2 + \frac{dy}{d\theta} \frac{d^2\theta}{dx^2}<br />

for short, without parameters. By substituting

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{d\theta} = -\sin\theta<br />

<br /> \frac{d^2\theta}{dx^2} = -\frac{x}{(1-x^2)^{3/2}} = -\frac{\cos\theta}{\sin^3\theta}<br />

and some previous expressions, we get

<br /> \frac{d^2\tilde{y}}{dx^2} = -\sin\theta \frac{1}{\sin^2\theta}\; +\; \cos\theta\frac{-\cos\theta}{\sin^3\theta} = -\frac{1}{\sin^3\theta} = -\textrm{cosec}^3\theta<br />
 
Last edited:
Gokul43201 said:
Are you sure that's right? I think I get a different answer using y =\sqrt{1-x^2}...

Hehe. Or alternatively one can calculate

<br /> D^2_x \sqrt{1-x^2} = D_x \frac{-x}{\sqrt{1-x^2}} = \cdots = -\frac{1}{(1-x^2)^{3/2}}<br />

:redface:

well, rohanprabhu, I hope you find the equation

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = \frac{d^2y}{d\theta^2} \Big(\frac{d\theta}{dx}\Big)^2 + \frac{dy}{d\theta} \frac{d^2\theta}{dx^2}<br />

interesting, at least. It could be useful if the mappings \theta\mapsto y(\theta) and \theta\mapsto x(\theta) were something different.
 
Last edited:
Gokul43201 said:
Are you sure that's right? I think I get a different answer using y =\sqrt{1-x^2}...

i'm not sure that this is right or not.. but I've been using this formula for my textbook questions.. and it sort of works. But since my textbooks doesn't really have advanced problems to deal with, i am not sure how applicable this formula is..

EDIT1:

no way.. i am totally wrong in this one. I tried doing using

<br /> y = \sqrt{1 - x^2}<br />

and I'm getting a totally different answer. I need to refer some valid source first..

EDIT2:

in the second method, I multiplied the values wrongly. I am not getting cosec(θ), but cosec³θ . But still, I'm losing a (-) sign somewhere.

@jostpuur: the post u made was p.e.r.f.e.c.t. Beautiful explanation.. thanks a lot.. now i truly understand it. and also.. ur formula was perfect...

P.S: you seriously typed all that in LaTeX?
P.S2: Could u tell me what exactly θ → x(θ) means.. does it mean something like, for a set of values of 'θ', we have a set of values of 'x' or that the argument of the function y-tilde varies as a function of 'θ'.
 
Last edited:
I later realized there's a chance, that I just didn't understand what

<br /> \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = \frac{d}{d\theta}(\frac{dy}{dx})\times(\frac{d\theta}{dx})<br />

was supposed to mean, and that you had done a calculation mistake after this. Could you explain what this is?

rohanprabhu said:
P.S2: Could u tell me what exactly θ → x(θ) means.. does it mean something like, for a set of values of 'θ', we have a set of values of 'x' or that the argument of the function y-tilde varies as a function of 'θ'.

For example, if you want to define a mapping f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}, f(x)=x^2, you could alternatively do it by talking about mapping \mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}, x\mapsto x^2. The arrow used to define how each member gets mapped is \mapsto, which is different from the usual one.
 
rohanprabhu said:
P.S: you seriously typed all that in LaTeX?

This is no-life.
 
jostpuur said:
I later realized there's a chance, that I just didn't understand what

\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = \frac{d}{d\theta}(\frac{dy}{dx})\times(\frac{d\theta}{dx})

was supposed to mean, and that you had done a calculation mistake after this. Could you explain what this is?

This was a formula taught to us for the 2nd order derivative of a parametric function.

jostpuur said:
This is no-life.

totally ;)
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Eureka.. the formula you provided and the one taught to me by my teacher is the same.. I spent some time over this, and arrived at this proof [finally :D]..

I have attached a screenshot of the proof, as I did the typeset in Mathematica [typing that much LaTeX would have been a pain...]
 

Attachments

  • calculus_proof_1.jpg
    calculus_proof_1.jpg
    21.5 KB · Views: 1,085
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K