Difference Between Electrical and Optical Signal Encryption?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between encrypting electrical signals and optical signals, specifically addressing the processes of encryption in both domains and the implications of each approach. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of signal encryption techniques, including symmetric and asymmetric methods.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the necessity of encrypting in the optical domain, suggesting that encrypting in the electrical domain before conversion to optics may be simpler.
  • Others propose that an all-optical processor could offer better security by avoiding vulnerabilities associated with software insertion via networks.
  • There is mention of potential advantages in encryption speed with parallel optical processors, though concerns about compatibility with existing image compression techniques are raised.
  • A participant introduces a specific scheme for all-optical encryption/decryption of QPSK signals, indicating ongoing exploration of advanced optical encryption methods.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the commercial viability of optical encryption techniques compared to traditional methods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether encrypting in the optical domain is advantageous compared to electrical encryption. Multiple competing views remain regarding the practicality and effectiveness of each approach.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on the specific conditions under which optical encryption may be preferred, as well as unresolved questions about the integration of compression techniques with optical encryption methods.

Who May Find This Useful

Researchers and practitioners in the fields of signal processing, telecommunications, and cryptography may find this discussion relevant, particularly those interested in the comparative analysis of encryption techniques across different signal domains.

Fiona Rozario
Messages
52
Reaction score
1
What is the difference between encrypting an electrical signal and converting it to optics; & converting the signal to optics and then encrypting it? (Any of the symmetric or asymmetric encryption techniques).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Fiona Rozario said:
What is the difference between encrypting an electrical signal and converting it to optics; & converting the signal to optics and then encrypting it? (Any of the symmetric or asymmetric encryption techniques).
What are your thoughts? And how do you propose to encrypt the optical signal?
 
With reference to the papers attached...I am just unclear in my head as to why one would need to encrypt in the optical domain. Wouldn't it be just simpler to encrypt in the electrical domain and then convert it to optics?
 

Attachments

It is unlikely at this stage that such an optical technique would have a commercial advantage. If it did they would not be publishing their research.

The advantage of an all optical processor would be better security because it could not be “wedged” by the insertion of hostile software via the net. A parallel optical processor would improve image encryption speed.

Optical encryption has a disadvantage in that it cannot benefit from widely used image compression techniques and requires a reliable error correction code. There is however a possibility of using optical techniques such as spatial frequency analysis prior to optical encryption. Maybe that is how they could implement compression?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_optics#Fourier_analysis_and_functional_decomposition
 
A scheme for all-optical encryption/decryption of QPSK signals based on ND-FWM in HNLF is proposed
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
956
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K