I Difference Between Locally Flat & Locally Inertial?

Click For Summary
Locally flat and locally inertial are distinct concepts in general relativity. Locally flat refers to spacetime where tidal forces diminish faster than first order, applicable to all spacetimes regardless of curvature. In contrast, locally inertial describes a reference frame where the metric takes a specific form, which is not universally true for all coordinate systems. While a locally flat spacetime allows for the existence of a locally inertial frame at any point, the two terms are not interchangeable. Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping the nuances of spacetime geometry and reference frames in general relativity.
  • #31
Dale said:
Ah, I see. You are using “frame” to mean something different from “coordinate chart”. Possibly you mean something like a tetrad? So you could describe an inertial tetrad in terms of a polar coordinate basis.

I was using “frame” to mean “coordinate chart”
Do you mean that a tetrad/verbatin can be said inertial when its unit timelike vector field is indeed inertial (i.e. its timelike integral curve results in a geodesic of underlying spacetime) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
cianfa72 said:
Do you mean that a tetrad/verbatin can be said inertial when its unit timelike vector field is indeed inertial (i.e. its timelike integral curve results in a geodesic of underlying spacetime) ?
Yes, with the additional restriction that the spacelike vector fields do not rotate along the timelike integral curves
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and cianfa72
  • #33
To define a general rotation free (non-inertial) frame of reference along an arbitrary time-like curve you use Fermi-Walker transport of the three space-like vectors of a tetrad with the time-like vector being, of course, the tangent vector on this time-like curve.

If the time-like curve is a geodesic this defines a local inertial frame along the time-like curve, and the Fermi-Walker transport of the space-like vectors of the tetrad is identical with parallel transport.
 
  • Informative
Likes Dale
  • #34
Dale said:
No. Because “flat” is a term that describes a spacetime and “inertial” is a term that describes a reference frame, worldline, or coordinate chart. You wouldn’t say “this is an inertial manifold” and you wouldn’t say “this is a flat reference frame”, so the terms are not interchangeable.
I agree and would add some further distinctions:

- inertial motion is a characteristic of world line (and of a body to the extent it can be approximated by a world line). In SR and GR, this corresponds to the world line being a timelike geodesic.

- an inertial frame or coordinate system is one whose (t,0,0,0) world line is inertial and the rest is built by a standard procedure from the origin world line.

- locally flat in GR is simply the property that in small regions and short times, SR is a good approximation to GR. Or, mathematically, that all curvature effects (e.g. triangle angular defect/surplus) go to zero as size goes to zero. Curvature at a point is realized by normalizing by the area. Without normalization, the effect goes to zero as the square of the size. This has nothing to do with the coordinates or motion, and is simply part ot the definition of a Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian manifold.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Dale

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
11K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
786
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
568
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
666
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K